views:

1305

answers:

24
+12  Q: 

What is Web 3.0?

My boss asked me this yesterday just to gauge my response. Apparently, some of our clients are asking for "Web 3.0"

I told him I really didn't know.

He said when he's asked around the consensus is that it's microformats, etc. Frankly no one really knew either. (probably get a varied response now to "what is web 2.0?" still)

I watched a demo video of Mozilla's Ubiquity this morning and thought to myself "wow this could possibly be what Web 3.0 is all about"

What does Web 3.0 mean to you? How should we as developers prepare for the Web 3.0 world?

+57  A: 

It means the Marketing Department are in charge again.

sparkes
Bril. Don't know whether to laugh or cry, but ROTF.
Brent.Longborough
+5  A: 

To me, Web 3.0 is getting closer to the Semantic Web dream.

wvdschel
+2  A: 

Crickey, I'm still getting my head around Web 2.0

Martin
A: 

Personally, I think that Web 3.0 is when we get to the point that most of the applications we use are delivered via the Web and the underlying OS has not bearing at all. All you would need is something that has web access a proper browser and is completely standards compliant (Sorry IE). And actually, it may not even be a browser in the current sense. We could eventually have OSs (like gOS) that are meant to do everything via the web and there is no real desktop or file system, and instead loads up directly to the web and all your apps.

Adam Haile
But the real question is why would you want that? So we put all this work into making computers fast and then all we do with them is parse HTML and serve content in "rectangles" (as Joel calls them) that don't even mesh with the "Web" experience?
BobbyShaftoe
@BobbyShaftoe: if only i could +1 this more than once!
just somebody
+34  A: 

Meaningless buzztalk. Avoid.

Bernard
This a thousand times. Terse and oh so correct.
temp2290
+20  A: 

Here's what some guy from Google had to say about Web 3.0:

Google CEO Eric Schmidt was recently at the Seoul Digital Forum and he was asked to define Web 3.0 by an audience member. After first joking that Web 2.0 is "a marketing term", Schmidt launched into a great definition of Web 3.0. He said that while Web 2.0 was based on Ajax, Web 3.0 will be "applications that are pieced together" - with the characteristics that the apps are relatively small, the data is in the cloud, the apps can run on any device (PC or mobile), the apps are very fast and very customizable, and are distributed virally (social networks, email, etc).

Source from Read/Write/Web

happyappa
Best comment under that video: "Funny, I thought web 2.0 was about gradient backgrounds and rounded corners..." xD
Arnis L.
So, all these decades of development, and they've suddenly invented Unix for the Web?
McBeth
+16  A: 

Web 3.0 Is the result of irresponsible naming. When someone decided to call desktop-like stateful web applications (Or is it just lots of reflection effects? No one is sure.) "web 2.0", they intentionally or unintentionally gave the impression that it was bigger, better, stronger, and thus everyone must have it. It somehow got into the news that whatever this thing was, it existed and it was nice, so all the business owners in the world wanted to have it, even though they didn't know for sure what it even was. Finally, one of them thought, "We have 2.0, but our customers demand to be fulfilled, and the essence of our product is not useful enough to satisfy them! We must impress them more! Isn't 3.0 coming out yet?" and all his/her lackeys nodded their heads in agreement and yelled out things like "microformats!", "visual feed mashups!", "cloud computing!". Our suffering thus continues.

infralite
...as if it's not enough with supporting Internet Explorer. :)
Arnis L.
+1 you got my last vote today :)
RCIX
+5  A: 

Web 3.0 is semantic web integration. It's not going to happen. It looks something like: 1. Code all of your business data in microformats and RDF stores legible within first-order predicate logic 2. ... 3. Profit!

Web 2.0 was a very sucessful, carefully orchestrated web of overlapping technologies promoted by Tim O'Reilly: http://www.lastampa.it/multimedia/multimedia.asp?p=1&IDmsezione=29&IDalbum=8558&tipo=VIDEO

John the Statistician
nice south park reference.
Lamar
That really ignores the benefits of putting data into a form accessible to first order logic - by standardizing the abstract data model you make it easy to combine concrete data models using tools that understand first order logic - no more nasty mashing up data - it should all smoothly mesh together.
Simon Gibbs
@Lamar i remembered the same! xD
Arnis L.
+2  A: 

I think the best answer would use as many adverbs as possible. The answer I usually give is: "Generations of technology are identified only after the fact, and web 3.0 will just be whatever happens next."

Steve French
+6  A: 

I'm skipping Web 3.0 and moving straight to Web 4.0

Simucal
you mean Web 95.... but you might just want to wait until Web 7.
Jimmy
+1 for web seven! (0:
KMan
Make sure you upgrade to Web 4.0 Pro edition. Standard edition is just not worth it.
Chubas
+6  A: 

I'm waiting for at least Web SP1

Factor Mystic
As some company taught us: before that, it's not usable. I'm waiting with you
Cassy
+50  A: 

I'm waiting for Web 3.11 for workgroups.

Kibbee
made me lol :-)
Cassy
You, sir, made me smile. +1
esegura
+1  A: 

As far as I'm aware, Web 2.0 was the widespread adoption of AJAX

Web 3.0 is the marketing department going "Hey, this web 2.0 really got popular, maybe we can get some attention by upping the number and attaching it to whatever rubbish technology we happen to have at hand! Awesome leveraging of synergies!"

Orion Edwards
+1  A: 

I think next web step (3.14, 3.00, 95 or something) is ambiental information computing. Computer understanding what your up to and trying to help you in different ways. Understanding you, the context and the world around you.

Interesting, useful and fun stuff can be done then.

Semantic web is just a technical subset, but it is way to narrow to be the web3.0

Andraz Tori, CTO at Zemanta

+1  A: 

I really do not like the term Web 3.0 and it's often view as the semantic web which is he new vision of the web. I will try to describe the semantic web bellow but feel free to visit my blog or contact me if you want more info.

A semantic web is a set of technologies that will enable software to understand the web. Today, our web is like a file server where you have just a bunch of documents that can not be used smartly. Tomorrow, our known web will be more like a database that applications will share using mashups of data and standards like RDF, GRDDL, OWL, SPARQL coming out of the WWW Consortium. These standards enable the meaning of the information on the web but we will not have a smarter web without human inputs (at least not in this decade) visit website like freebase paralax, Twine or hakia in order to have a view on those nascent semantic apps.

+1  A: 

web 3.0 is a minor marketing upgrade to web 2.0, which failed to deliver on the promise of utopia

i am waiting for web 4.11, that's where the real info will be!

Steven A. Lowe
+3  A: 

Web 3.0 is a lot of things. Real-time is definitely one of them. With that said, I believe technologies like XMPP are going to play a major role.

cgbystrom
+2  A: 

Two more bugs than Web 1.0?

Paul.

Paul W Homer
A: 

Web 3.0 is simply one step closer to Web 4.20 (i.e. the singularity.)

temp2290
A: 

A term to convince venture capitalists that your business proposal isn't going to crash and burn like everything in the original dot com era.

Jasconius
A: 

<off-topic>
It's interesting to note that software version numbers tend to end at 3.x, after which the marketing guys usually rename the product, usually by adding a "Plus" or "Pro" to the name. So it's rare to seen a version 4.x of anything.
</off-topic>

Loadmaster
A: 

why do we need web x.0 ?

Kubi
A: 

It is about web of data as an evolution of web of documents. It is about standard data representation and standard interfaces along with data meaning.

Bill
A: 

http://kateray.net/film

kateray