tags:

views:

78

answers:

2

When a user submits a form I need to make sure that the input contains at least a minimum number of digits. The problem is that I don't know what format the input will be in. The digits likely won't be in a row, and might be separated by letters, punctuation, spaces, etc. I don't care about the rest of the string.

I'd like to check this with a RegularExpressionValidator but I'm not quite sure how to write the regex.

I guess this would be similar to a phone number regex, but a phone number at least has some common formats.

+9  A: 

The following will match an input string containing at least n digits:

Regex.IsMatch(input, @"(\D*\d){n}");

where n is an integer value.

A short explanation:

  • \D* matches zero or more non-digit chars (\D is a short hand for [^0-9] or [^\d]);
  • so \D*\d matches zero or more non-digit chars followed by a digit;
  • and (\D*\d){n} groups, and repeats, the previous n times.
Bart Kiers
i pondered this for a while and reached the conclusion that it couldn't be done without a repetitive pattern. but once you see it it's strikingly obvious. elegant! +1
David Hedlund
might want to explain why this works...
annakata
@David, thanks! @annakata, I've added more explanation to my post.
Bart Kiers
Thanks, Bart! I have to agree with what David said. Nice solution :)
Brandon
@Brandon, you're welcome!
Bart Kiers
@Bart, is there a way to make this take in a minimum instead of a set number? I tried replacing `{n}` with `{n,}`, but that breaks it. It starts counting the non-digits as well.
Brandon
I'm not too familiar with the .NET regex engine, but I'd say `{n,}` should worl as well. AFAIK, `@"(\D*\d){n}"` causes the engine to look for **at least** `n` occurrences of `(\D*\d)` so it wouldn't make any difference to use either `{n}` or `{n,}`. Sorry I can't be of any more assistance!
Bart Kiers
+2  A: 

I would approach it something like this:

Regex.IsMatch(input, @"^(.*[0-9].*){10}$");

In words, this would search for 10 digits, each of which are surrounded by 0 or more characters. Since the .* are greedy, any additional digits would be matched by them as well.

Anyway, check out http://regexlib.com/RETester.aspx It can be really hard to write a regular expression without something to test against.

Slider345
+1, thanks for the help. I've been using regexpal.com, but that one looks a little better. Thanks for the link.
Brandon