The syntax ambiguity that Crockford refers is that if an open curly brace is not found on expression context, it will be recognized like a block, and not like the start of a object literal.
For example:
{"foo": "bar"} // SyntaxError
Will give you a syntax error, because it will be interpreted as a block, with a string literal "foo", and a unexpected usage of the token :
.
On the other hand, the parentheses, formally called the grouping operator, can only evaluate expressions, therefore we will not have any syntax ambiguity because a block can only be expected on a statement context.
({"foo": "bar"})
Edit: @el.pescado makes an interesting question:
Can you explain why eval('{}') is undefined?
ECMAScript describes an internal type to explain the behavior of statements, it's called The Completion Specification Type.
Values of the Completion type are triples of the form of (type, value, target)
, where type
can be normal
, break
, continue
, return
, or throw
.
value
can be any language value or empty
, and target
any Identifier or empty
.
An empty block (the production Block : {}
) explicitly returns the following completion:
Return (normal, empty, empty).
The eval
function, after executing the code, and exiting the newly created execution context, checks the result completion of the evaluated code, and in the Step 7 we can see that undefined
is explicitly returned if the completion type is normal
and the completion value is empty
:
...
7- If result.type is normal and its completion value is empty, then return the value undefined.
...