views:

71

answers:

4

How do I do the following:

var object = {
    alpha: 'one',
    beta: **alpha's value**
}

without splitting the object creation into two parts?

A: 

You cannot do that with {} object creation.

ndim
+5  A: 

You can't, object literal syntax just doesn't support this, you'll have to create a variable first then use it for both, like this:

var value = 'one';
var object = {
  alpha: value,
  beta: value
};

Or...something entirely different, but you can't reference alpha when doing beta, because neither property has been created yet, not until the object statement runs as a whole is either accessible.

Nick Craver
.. I'm getting "o is undefined"
Nick
@BrunoLM - Nope: http://jsfiddle.net/nick_craver/Gnbjq/ Again `o` is `undefined` when you're trying to use it.
Nick Craver
+6  A: 

You can't, as noted. The closest equivalent is:

var object = new (function()
{
    this.alpha = 'one';
    this.beta = this.alpha;
})();

This uses a singleton instance created from an anonymous function. You can also declare private fields with var.

Matthew Flaschen
A: 

Another idea for a way to create that object, without cluttering the scope with any new variables:

var lit = function(shared) {
return {
    alpha: shared.v1,
    beta: shared.v2,
    gamma: "three", 
    delta: shared.v1

};
}(
 {
    v1: "one",
    v2: "two",
 }
);

One of those statements you're not sure how to indent....

Amitay Dobo