views:

25

answers:

2

Hi!

I'd like to know if anyone has found a solution for writing human-readable method tests names, so non-tech guys may read test list and they'll be able to understand what's going on, and, in instance, programmers won't need to use "non-tech-guy-friendly naming conventions" like "Whatever_Whatever2_Whatever3_DoesHelloWorldTest" anymore...?

Thank you in advance

+3  A: 

There is alot to be said for the clear and understandable convention:

MethodName_StateUnderTest_ExpectedBehavior

(not restricted to VS2010 or even .NET)

Mitch Wheat
I follow this same convention.
Steven
A: 

Hey, Mitch Weat and Steven.

I know this convention, remember my post where it says:

in instance, programmers won't need to use "non-tech-guy-friendly naming conventions" like "Whatever_Whatever2_Whatever3_DoesHelloWorldTest" anymore...?

I'm looking for avoid this. This is the point :)

Anyway, very thanks for answering my question!

Matías Fidemraizer