It cannot be called classic, because that would get confused with classic ASP. I don't like calling it traditional because of the connotation that word has.
Do we called it: Normal ASP.NET Mainstream ASP.NET ASP.NET MVP
What else?
views:
71answers:
2Can you provide documentation for this?
Baddie
2010-08-04 20:19:50
Can you also provide documentation regarding the documentation?
STW
2010-08-04 20:51:29
There's ASP.NET, and on top of that there are Web Forms and MVC. @Baddie: http://www.asp.net/web-forms
Necros
2010-08-04 20:56:03
@Baddie From the asp.net site: http://www.asp.net/get-started
marcind
2010-08-04 20:57:22
Scott Guthrie refers to the two technologies using this terminology. Considering he heads up that area at Microsoft, I would say he's pretty much the authority: http://weblogs.asp.net/scottgu/archive/2010/01/24/about-technical-debates-both-in-general-and-regarding-asp-net-web-forms-and-asp-net-mvc-in-particular.aspx
Dave Markle
2010-08-04 20:57:27
Forgot to wrap my initial comment with <sarcasm />
Baddie
2010-08-04 22:21:37
A:
What's wrong with just "ASP.NET"? It's "ASP.NET MVC" that is the clarifier. Do you mean in speech or referring to tags here?
maatthias
2010-08-04 20:49:43
ASP.NET is the common denominator between ASP.NET WebForms and ASP.NET MVC. MVC does not supercede ASP.NET, so MVC *is* ASP.NET just like WebForms *is* ASP.NET
STW
2010-08-04 20:53:56