Given that both the client and the server need to know everything about the object being remoted, firstly is this tight coupling, and secondly can .Net Remoting work in any other way?
+1
A:
Not really answering your question, but if you want to loosen the coupling, you might look at WCF's NETTCP binding as an alternative. The client can create a proxy for the entities - this way you won't need to share any assemblies (notably Entities) between client and server.
nonnb
2010-08-13 07:07:23
Thanks for this, I knew WCF would be able to make some improvements
ck
2010-08-13 08:06:21