RPM is the package format in LSB but does LSB force any naming standard for RPMs similarly to this:
http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ch-rpm-file-format.html
Thank you in advance
RPM is the package format in LSB but does LSB force any naming standard for RPMs similarly to this:
http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/ch-rpm-file-format.html
Thank you in advance
In the relevant section of the "LSB Book", Packaging, it's only required
lsb-However, the standard LSB packaging tool wrapper, makelsbpkg, is said to generate package names in the form mypackage-1.0.0-1.%arch.rpm, which, I guess is the name-version-release.architecture.rpm scheme you linked to.
(I think, it's intended that package name (mypackange in the example above, already contains lsb- prefix. I'm not sure, never actually ran the tool.)