views:

267

answers:

3
+6  Q: 

Futures in Haskell

Does Haskell have an equivalent of Alice's ability to bind a variable to a future?

val a = spawn foo;

where foo is some function.

I know Haskell supports channels and threads; I'm hoping for syntax as natural as Alice's to bind a value to a future and spawn a thread to calculate it without having to deal with the details.

+7  A: 

You can use par from Control.Parallel as in

a `par` f a b c
where
  a = foo

This is a hint to the runtime that a could be evaluated in another thread.

Daniel Velkov
thank you, that works well
Hosiers
+9  A: 

Funny, I was just reading a new post by Simon Marlow: Parallel programming in Haskell with explicit futures. Apparently he and others have been working on some new parallel programming abstractions that are intended to be more natural and explicit than the par and pseq APIs.

Daniel Pratt
+4  A: 

Not in the standard library, but

http://ghcmutterings.wordpress.com/2010/08/20/parallel-programming-in-haskell-with-explicit-futures/

data Future a = Future a

fork :: Eval a -> Eval (Future a)
fork a = do a' <- rpar (runEval a); return (Future a')

join :: Future a -> Eval a
join (Future a) = a `pseq` return a
Alexey Romanov
"parallel" is part of the Haskell Platform, and regular lazy futures (`par` ) are already part of it.
Don Stewart