views:

47

answers:

3

Well this interactive python console snippet will tell everything:

>>> class Test:
...     def __str__(self):
...             return 'asd'
...
>>> t = Test()
>>> print t
asd
>>> l = [Test(), Test(), Test()]
>>> print l
[__main__.Test instance at 0x00CBC1E8, __main__.Test instance at 0x00CBC260,
 __main__.Test instance at 0x00CBC238]

Basically I would like to get three 'asd' string printed when I print the list. I have also tried pprint but it gives the same results.

+4  A: 

Try:

class Test:
   def __repr__(self):
       return 'asd'

And read this: http://docs.python.org/reference/datamodel.html#object.__repr__

gruszczy
Thanks, it worked great!
BlinK_
+1  A: 

You need to make a __repr__ method:

>>> class Test:
    def __str__(self):
        return 'asd'
    def __repr__(self):
        return 'zxcv'


>>> [Test(), Test()]
[zxcv, zxcv]
>>> print _
[zxcv, zxcv]

Refer to the docs:

object.__repr__(self)

Called by the repr() built-in function and by string conversions (reverse quotes) to compute the “official” string representation of an object. If at all possible, this should look like a valid Python expression that could be used to recreate an object with the same value (given an appropriate environment). If this is not possible, a string of the form <...some useful description...> should be returned. The return value must be a string object. If a class defines __repr__() but not __str__(), then __repr__() is also used when an “informal” string representation of instances of that class is required.

This is typically used for debugging, so it is important that the representation is information-rich and unambiguous.

Mark Rushakoff
From the documentation provided in the answer, it seems that I do not need __str__ definition if __repr__ is used. Thank you for your input.
BlinK_
@Blink_: It depends on what exactly you want. Using the class I have defined, compare the output of `print Test()` against `print [Test()]`.
Mark Rushakoff
+3  A: 

The suggestion in other answers to implement __repr__ is definitely one possibility. If that's unfeasible for whatever reason (existing type, __repr__ needed for reasons other than aesthetic, etc), then just do

print [str(x) for x in l]

or, as some are sure to suggest, map(str, l) (just a bit more compact).

Alex Martelli