I'm not sure about a specific question, but having a detailed conversation with the individual and listening to how they choose their words, construct their sentences, and interact with you would be a good way to gauge basic communication skill - which will often translate to written communications as well.
For example, select a technical topic the candidate knows well and ask them to describe, in detail, some aspect of the topic. Listen to how precisely they choose their descriptions and how appropriate the words they are choosing actually are. Requirements documents are often implemented literally by developers so it's critical that the terms and words the writers are using be the correct terms. "Words have meanings" - use them correctly. :)
Something else to listen for is the frequent use of generic, vague, or broad terms. Translated into a requirements document, this will lead to confusion, conflicts in requirements, and time wasted to clarify. Most companies have a common diction or 'lingo' that req. writers are expected to learn, but if you lack the discipline to learn and use descriptions correctly, then it will do your writing no good.
Finally, during the conversation, ask clarifying questions and observe if their response is just a rephrased version of what they originally said, or if they change gears and clarify using a new angle. Because we don't all see things the same way, the ability to rephrase a concept to be more understandable to a specific listener is very helpful for clarification sessions. In an interview or discussion, you are the listener and a good requirements writer should be able to help you understand what they are saying.