Basically, in SQL Server, a unique constraint is indeed realized by means of a unique index.
The differences between a UNIQUE constraint and a UNIQUE INDEX are quite subtle, really. If you create a UNIQUE INDEX, you can reference that in a foreign key constraints from another table (doesn't work if you create a UNIQUE constraint....).
So what's the difference? Well - a unique constraint really is more of a logical thing on a table - you want to express the intent that the contents of a given column (or group of columns) is unique.
A unique index (like most indices) is more of a "behind-the-scenes" implementation detail.
From my point of view, unless you really have a problem with it, I'd always use a UNIQUE INDEX - the benefit of being part of a referential integrity constraint is quite valid and can be very useful in certain cases. Funtionally, in practice, there's no difference between using a Unique Constraint vs. Unique Index, really.