Why is Vista64 using a 32bit cmd.exe by default? (machine-specific)

Question

(I have this weird configuration problem at work, so I thought I'd give this site a try. My Google-Fu is failing me...)

The situation: I need to convert our current development environment from XP 32bit to Vista 64bit (*). Naturally, I've run into plenty of places in our build system where hardcoded paths were problematic (e.g. "C:\Program Files" becoming "C:\Program Files (x86)"). Fortunately, there is a %ProgramFiles% environment variable which maps to the proper directory based on the source process (32bit or 64bit). So I updated the build scripts with %ProgramFiles% and I was sure it'd be the end of that.

The build environment is called from the command-line (C:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe).

The problem: On one specific machine (namely my dev machine at work), it turns out that C:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe is actually a 32bit process, so the scripts find the x86 version of the Program Files directory and everything works great.

On every other 64bit machine I can find (including my home machine), C:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe is the 64bit version, and the 32bit version is in C:\Windows\SysWow64\cmd.exe. So the build scripts can't find anything they're looking for and fail.

I understand now that the 32bit cmd.exe should be called explicitly if that's what you need, and by default you get a 64bit cmd.exe. Typical case of WORKSFORME...

The question is, what happened to the machine where this is not true? Why am I getting a 32bit cmd.exe by default on one machine but not on others? In all cases I am explicitly executing C:\Windows\System32\cmd.exe from the Start|Run menu but getting different results on one machine only. All are running the same edition of Vista 64bit.

Any thoughts or insight?

Thanks!

(*) Please accept that I must do this, I am not at liberty to say why I am doing this. Re-installing the OS and everything from scratch would probably work, but is surely overkill. Besides, it was hard enough convincing our IT dept to give out Vista machines!

Answer 1

If you ran cmd from a 32-bit process, you'd get the 32-bit cmd because of File Redirection (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa384187.aspx). Do you get the 32-bit version of CMD when you run it from Explorer?

Answer 2

cmd.exe is launched from within the Start menu on both machines. Exact repro:

• Click the Start Orb
• Type "cmd", only one match comes up (c:\windows\system32\cmd.exe)
• Launch it.

On my work machine, it launches the 32bit version (as demonstrated by the Task Manager, it has *32 appended to the name in the Processes tab). On all other Vista 64 machines I've tried, this launches the 64bit version of cmd, and I cannot find a rational explanation for this behavior.

I haven't checked if explorer.exe itself was 32bit or 64bit on the affected machine, maybe this is related... Thanks for the hint.

Answer 3

Instead of %ProgramFiles%, isn't there a %Programfiles(x86)% that always goes where you want, regardless of which cmd.exe is running? My XP-64 systems all have that; excuse me for not taking the time to boot up a Vista system.

Answer 4

I have finally found the problem, and as expected it is quite simple: user error. Explorer (which is itself a 64bit process on Vista64) launches 64bit command prompts by default. If you want a 32bit CMD.EXE, you much explicitly reference C:\Windows\SysWoW64\CMD.EXE.

The reason this worked fine on my system is that I use Far Manager for most of my command-line usage, which is 32bit (therefore it launches 32bit Command Prompts). When I verified I must have confused a 32bit window for a 64bit window (after all they look the same!) and asked a stupid question.

Die in Sente, the problem with %ProgramFiles(x86)% is that it doesn't exist on Vista32, because that would have really been simpler.

Ah, nothing like a public posting to make a fool of yourself... :)