Is there comparation which NoSQL is designed for what purpose?
I'm especially interested in querying large amount of data practically read-only.
Edit: I mean comparation between NoSQL databases not about comparation with SQL databases.
Is there comparation which NoSQL is designed for what purpose?
I'm especially interested in querying large amount of data practically read-only.
Edit: I mean comparation between NoSQL databases not about comparation with SQL databases.
Soft NoSQL Systems: [not the original intention of "NoSQL" but mostly worth a look for great non relational solutions] Object Databases
db4o: API: Java, C#, .Net Langs, Protocol: language, Query Method: QBE (by Example), Soda, Native Queries, LINQ (.NET), Replication: db4o2db4o & dRS to relationals, Written in: Java, Cuncurrency: ACID serialized, Misc: embedded lib, Links: DZone Refcard #53 », Book »,
Versant: Languages/Protocol: Java, C#, C++, Python. Schema: language class model (easy changable). Modes: always consistent and eventually consistent Replication: synchronous fault tolerant and peer to peer asynchronous. Concurrency: optimistic and object based locks. Scaling: can add physical nodes on fly for scale out/in and migrate objects between nodes without impact to application code. Misc: MapReduce via parallel SQL like query across logical database groupings.
Objectivity: Languages: Java, C#, C++, Python, Smalltalk, SQL access through ODBC. Schema: native language class model, direct support for references, interoperable across all language bindings. 64 bit unique object ID (OID) supports multi exa-byte. Platforms: 32 and 64 bit Windows, Linux, Mac OSX, *Unix. Modes: always consistent (ACID). Concurrency: locks at cluster of objects (container) level. Scaling: unique distributed architecture, dynamic addition/removal of clients & servers, cloud environment ready. Replication: synchronous with quorum fault tolerant across peer to peer partitions.
[Gemstone, Progress ]
Perst: API: Java,Java ME,C#,Mono. Query method: OO via Perst collections, QBE, Native Queries, LINQ, native full-text search, JSQL Replication: Async+sync (master-slave) Written in: Java, C#. Caching: Object cache (LRU, weak, strong), page pool, in-memory database Concurrency: Pessimistic+optimistic (MVCC) + async or sync (ACID) Index types: Many tree models + Time Series. Misc.: Embedded lib., encryption, automatic recovery, native full text search, on-line or off-line backup.
ZODB: API: Python, Protocol: Internal, ZEO, Query Method: Direct object access, zope.catalog, gocept.objectquery, Replication: ZEO, ZEORAID, RelStorage Written in: Python, C Concurrency: MVCC, License: Zope Public License (OSI approved) Misc:Used in production since 1998
NEO: API: Python - ZODB "Storage" interface, Protocol: native, Query Method: transactional key-value, Replication: native, Written in: Python, Concurrency: MVCC at ZODB level, License: GPL "v2 or later", Misc: Load balancing, fault tolerant, hot-extensible.
StupidDB », KiokuDB » (Perl solution),
I found this nice list of NoSQL's at:
If you notice a little past midway down the page they have a nice list of noSQL's and appear to go into detail about each.