tags:

views:

41

answers:

2

Hi there,

there is quite extensive discussion about this topic on another website and I am really losing my confidence. The thing is that I claim that the amount (count) of visits is NOT a criteria for increasing the PR of the particular web because:

a) Google just doesn't know about every single visit on a webpage (in case it's not using GA)

b) Google just would not rate by something what Google actually affects

Thanks for your opinions. Peter.

A: 

Not quite. Google uses PageRank, which basically means that links from sites with high ratings score you more points than links from low quality sites. I would suggest you start with this question for more details about SEO.

Pace
A: 

Google does have access to some webpage visit logs by using for example Google Chrome or Google Toolbar on other browsers, so they might use this info in their ranking.

adranale
Are you sure about that? Chrome is reporting all site visits to Google?
Lazarus
and Google Analytics, and Google AdSense, and Google-hosted Ajax libraries like jQuery
Thilo
At least it was in their first version and this was in Chrome's user agreement. I heard that they changed the user agreement later, so I am not sure whether they have removed the corresponding part.
adranale
Well, Google might know about visits from Chrome, might know about visits from search results page, it definitely knows about visits of pages using Analytics. But that's not all of them, so can Google rate webpages by number of visits if it only knows this information from some of them?
petiar
it surely does not depend totally on this inaccurate information, but it might use it somehow to recognize pages that has low PageRank but are visited a lot (according to their visit statistics).
adranale