views:

1911

answers:

4

One-to-one relations within nhibernate can be lazyloaded either "false" or "proxy". I was wondering if anyone knows a way to do a lazy one-to-one mapping.

I worked out a hack to achieve the same result by using a lazy set mapped to a private field, and having the public property return the first result of that set. It works, but isn't the cleanest code...

Thanks in advance!

+3  A: 

As far as I know, there isn't a non-hacky way to lazy load a one-to-one. I hope I'm wrong, but last time I checked it was the case.

James Gregory
+3  A: 

Lazy loading of one-to-one isn't supported unless the association is mandatory. See here for the reasoning.

It boils down to the fact that in order to decide if the other side of the relationship exists (N)Hibernate has to go to the database. Since you've already taken the database hit, you might as well load the full object.

While there are cases where hitting the DB just to see if the related object exists without actually loading the object makes sense (if the related object is very "heavy"), it isn't currently supported in NHibernate.

Sean Carpenter
+1  A: 

There is way thought. It's described here in details :

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<hibernate-mapping xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2" assembly="NHibernateTest" namespace="NHibernateTest">
  <class name="Person" >
    <id name="PersonID" type="Int32">
      <generator class="identity" />
    </id>
    <property name="LastName" type="String" length="50" />
    <property name="FirstName" type="String" length="50" />
    <many-to-one name="Photo" class="PersonPhoto" />
  </class>

  <class name="PersonPhoto">
    <id name="PersonID" type="Int32">
      <generator class="foreign">
        <param name="property">Owner</param>
      </generator>
    </id>
    <property name="Photo" type="BinaryBlob" />
    <one-to-one name="Owner" class="Person" constrained="true" />
  </class>
</hibernate-mapping>
Artem Tikhomirov
Hi Artem, did you know your question about "Flash Media Server not calling application.onDisconnect handler ?" was deleted ? (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/359727) I can still see it because of my rep level. Do you want me to write a uservoice entry asking for its restoration ?
VonC
Huh. General(ist) is on the warpath :) C'mon VonC, take it ease. There is still your disclaimer on top of your answer. It was a fair play. Thank you for your honesty.
Artem Tikhomirov
A: 

I tried the example used by Artem Tikhomirov above. I kept getting an error that the Photo column does not exist. After looking at this, I figured out that the mapping was off a little. When I changed the many-to-one mapping to specify the column name like this:

many-to-one name="Photo" column="PersonID" class="PersonPhoto" unique="true"

I got it to work. I hope this helps someone :o)

David Yates