I agree with Mitch, but sometimes there's more to it.
A Factory approach can make your code cleaner, easier to use and maintain. In some ways they aren't much more than glorified constructors but they do give you extra flexibility.
- The factory methods can be given names that match their case of use.
- Callers only need to supply the parameters required. Admittedly you can also do this for 'normal' constructors but it's clearer to the caller why they should use a given constructor if it also has an appropriate name.
- Moving all complex code out of the constructors makes your code easier to maintain.
- Using a Full blown Factory (one that returns an abstract class / interface) gives you some abstraction from the concrete class itself.
Examples:
// Typlical constructor
public Page(pageId, title, url, keywords, content, tags, lastModified, lastModifiedBy)
{
// All values are set via the constructor.
//...
}
Factory methods:
public static Page PageByID(pageId)
{
// All properties are set internally here
//(directly or delegated as appropriate).
//...
}
public static Page NewPage(title, url)
{
// All properties not passed in are given
// appropriate default values.
//...
}
public static Page Page404()
{
// All properties are given
// appropriate default values.
//...
}