what is the difference between these two codes
type Foo
real, allocatable :: bar(:)
end type
and
type Foo
real, pointer :: bar(:)
end type
in particular when it comes to the following code:
type(Foo) :: myfoo
allocate(myfoo%bar(10))
what is the difference between these two codes
type Foo
real, allocatable :: bar(:)
end type
and
type Foo
real, pointer :: bar(:)
end type
in particular when it comes to the following code:
type(Foo) :: myfoo
allocate(myfoo%bar(10))
I do not see any principal difference in that scenario.
In general, ALLOCATABLE arrays are more efficient. But in Fortran 90/95 POINTER arrays were more flexible. For example, it was not possible to use ALLOCATABLE arrays as components of derived types. Fortran 2003 fixed that issue. So use ALLOCATABLE arrays when you can.
EDIT
Just want to mention significant difference in behavior of the program on the attempt to allocate already allocated entity. If the entity is ALLOCATABLE you'll get run-time error. The program
PROGRAM main
IMPLICIT NONE
TYPE :: foo
REAL, DIMENSION(:), ALLOCATABLE :: bar
END TYPE foo
TYPE(foo) :: my_foo
ALLOCATE (my_foo%bar(10))
ALLOCATE (my_foo%bar(10))
END PROGRAM main
compiled with gfortran results in such error message:
Fortran runtime error: Attempting to allocate already allocated variable 'my_foo'
In contrast you can do such things with POINTERs.