tags:

views:

1025

answers:

4

I'm looking for a decent, non-lame way to inhibit xscreensaver, kscreensaver, or gnome-screensaver, whichver might be running, preferably in a screensaver-agnostic manner, and it absolutely positively must execute fast.

I've read the xscreensaver FAQ ( http://www.jwz.org/xscreensaver/faq.html ).

I have a gtk based game program that's cranking out 30 frames/second while mixing several channels of audio, and since it's controlled by a joystick, sometimes "the" screensaver will kick in. I put "the" in quotes, because there are at least three different popular screensavers, xscreensaver, gnome-screensaver, and kscreensaver, each with their own unique and klunky methods by which an application might inhibit them.

Has anybody encapsulated the code to inhibit all of these into a fast chunk of code? Oh, and it has to be GPL compatible.

Currently my code simply whines piteously about the uncooperating screensaver developers if any screensaver is detected and the joystick is in use, and doesn't actually try to do anything other than advise the user to manually disable the screensaver, as the only other thing I can think to do is so incredibly ugly that I simply refuse to do it.

Just wondering if anybody else has run into this, and what they've done, and if they did anything, if it was as ugly as it seems to me it would have to be, or if there's some elegant solution out there... Seems like maybe synthesizing X events somehow to fool the screensaver into thinking there's some activity might do the trick in a universal way, but I'm really not sure how to do that (and hoping you wouldn't need to be root to do it.)

Any ideas?

Thanks,

-- steve

A: 

Movie-players typically disable screensavers. You could poke around the mplayer-code to see how they do it.

For regular X, they use XScreenSaverSuspend where supported.

Rolf Rander
+2  A: 

No, but yes...

There's no nice clean way to do this. In my opinion there should be a mechanism administrated by the X server, which both screensavers and interested applications can voluntarily use to negotiate suppression of any screensaver during the runtime of one or more programs. But no such mechanism yet exists to my knowledge. GNOME and KDE look to be implementing a DBUS approach to this problem, but in my opinion even if it becomes widespread (it isn't yet widespread enough to rely on it in 3rd party code) it's not the right approach.

However, xdg-screensaver is a FreeDesktop standardised shell script which you can run as a sub-process to control the screensaver. It controls most popular screensavers, and the OS vendor would be responsible for updating it/ maintaining it to work with newer screensavers or better ways of doing this in the future. Unlike many other kludges it will automatically re-enable the screensaver if your application crashes or exits via some route that forgets to call the re-enable code. See the manual page for details in how to use it.

As a GTK+ user probably the trickiest aspects of this for you would be creating the sub-process to run the shell script (if you haven't done this before you will want to find a tutorial about using fork + exec) and getting the XWindow ID of your application's main window to give to xdg-screensaver.

You ask that the code should be "fast". This makes me wonder if you're expecting to run it every frame - don't. The xdg-screensaver solution allows you to disable or renable the screensaver explicitly, rather than trying to suppress it once per frame or anything like that.

tialaramex
A: 

No, of course not expecting to run it every frame, but don't want it causing hiccups when it does run, is all. With my thought of synthesizing X events, I was imagining it would be just often enough to make the screen saver think there was activity.

Looking at xdg-screensaver (which seems to be a shell script that ultimately just does a "wait" for my process -- cool) it seems to be made to do just what I want. I knew I couldn't be the only or first one to face this problem.

Thanks!

-- steve

smcameron
A: 

Hmm, unfortuanately, at least on Fedora core 8, this does not appear to work.

The xdg-screensaver script is there, and seems to be intended to work, it just doesn't actually work.

Once you do "xdg-screensaver suspend window-id", where window id is gotten from within the program via

xwindow_id = GDK_WINDOW_XWINDOW (GTK_WIDGET (widget)->window);

Or whether the window id is gotten via xprop, and xdg-screensaver run manually, two processes are created:

[scameron@zuul wordwarvi]$ ps -efa | grep xdg
scameron  4218     1  0 20:12 pts/2    00:00:00 /bin/sh /usr/bin/xdg-screensaver suspend 0x3a00004
scameron  4223     1  0 20:12 pts/2    00:00:00 /bin/sh /usr/bin/xdg-screensaver suspend 0x3a00004
scameron  4313  3151  0 20:15 pts/1    00:00:00 grep xdg
[scameron@zuul wordwarvi]$ 

And they never die, even after the program they are supposedly waiting for dies, and the screensaver is never re-enabled.

[scameron@zuul wordwarvi]$ xdg-screensaver status
disabled
[scameron@zuul wordwarvi]$ ls -ltr /tmp | grep xdg
-rw------- 1 scameron scameron    15 2009-01-20 20:12 xdg-screensaver-scameron--0.0
[scameron@zuul wordwarvi]$ 

Running xdg-screensaver resume window-id does not resume the screensaver.

To re-enable the screensaver, I have to manually kill them, and manually remove the files it leaves around in /tmp:

[scameron@zuul wordwarvi]$ kill 4218 4223
[scameron@zuul wordwarvi]$ rm /tmp/xdg-screensaver-scameron--0.0 
[scameron@zuul wordwarvi]$ xdg-screensaver status
enabled
[scameron@zuul wordwarvi]$ 

So, good intentions, but doesn't seem to actually work.

smcameron