tags:

views:

4273

answers:

6

I want to reopen the stdin and stdout (and perhaps stderr while I'm at it) filehandles, so that future calls to printf() or putchar() or puts() will go to a file, and future calls to getc() and such will come from a file.

1) I don't want to permanently lose standard input/output/error. I may want to reuse them later in the program.

2) I don't want to open new filehandles because these filehandles would have to be either passed around a lot or global (shudder).

3) I don't want to use any open() or fork() or other system-dependent functions if I can't help it.

So basically, does it work to do this:

stdin = fopen("newin", "r");

And, if it does, how can I get the original value of stdin back? Do I have to store it in a FILE * and just get it back later?

+8  A: 

I think you're looking for something like freopen()

-John

John T
Is there any difference between stdin = freopen("newin", "r", stdin); and fclose(stdin); stdin = fopen("newin", "r"); or no?
Chris Lutz
fopen opens a file object while freopen points your data stream at the file object.From the page "This function is specially useful for redirecting predefined streams like stdin, stdout and stderr to specific files"
John T
Is there any way to reopen stdin/stdout to their original values other than stdin = freopen("/dev/tty", "r"); or something?
Chris Lutz
you use fclose with the stream you pointed at the file. fclose(stdout);
John T
+2  A: 

The os function dup2() should provide what you need (if not references to exactly what you need).

More specifically, you can dup2() the stdin file descriptor to another file descriptor, do other stuff with stdin, and then copy it back when you want.

The dup() function duplicates an open file descriptor. Specifically, it provides an alternate interface to the service provided by the fcntl() function using the F_DUPFD constant command value, with 0 for its third argument. The duplicated file descriptor shares any locks with the original.

On success, dup() returns a new file descriptor that has the following in common with the original:

  • Same open file (or pipe)
  • Same file pointer (both file descriptors share one file pointer)
  • Same access mode (read, write, or read/write)
gahooa
The question explicitly says not to use system-dependent functions, though.
unwind
And the question explicitly says limit the # of open streams / file descriptors
Tim Post
+1  A: 

freopen solves the easy part. Keeping old stdin around is not hard if you haven't read anything and if you're willing to use POSIX system calls like dup or dup2. If you're started to read from it, all bets are off.

Maybe you can tell us the context in which this problem occurs?

I'd encourage you to stick to situations where you're willing to abandon old stdin and stdout and can therefore use freopen.

Norman Ramsey
In context, I think I could get away with abandoning the old stdin/stdout if I really had to. I'm trying to add to my program an option for the program to redirect stdin and stdout itself, for people who are running the program and don't know their shell very well. Just for the hell of it.
Chris Lutz
My students definitely have trouble with I/O redirection, so your goal sound like a good one. Maybe you'd be better off with command-line options -i and -o to name input and output files?
Norman Ramsey
That's my plan more or less (-i and -o are already taken, but that's the general interface), I just needed a way to implement it (without having to change all my printf()s to fprintf()s and pass around two filehandles every which way). Plus, a flag for stderr rerouting would be nice.
Chris Lutz
In the long run you'll be happy passing filehandles, but if you have legacy code in place, freopen() is your friend.
Norman Ramsey
+6  A: 

Why use freopen()? The C89 specification has the answer in one of the endnotes for the section on <stdio.h>:

116. The primary use of the freopen function is to change the file associated with a standard text stream (stderr, stdin, or stdout), as those identifiers need not be modifiable lvalues to which the value returned by the fopen function may be assigned.

freopen is commonly misused, e.g. stdin = freopen("newin", "r", stdin);. This is no more portable than fclose(stdin); stdin = fopen("newin", "r");. Both expressions attempt to assign to stdin, which is not guaranteed to be assignable.

The right way to use freopen is to omit the assignment: freopen("newin", "r", stdin);

bk1e
You don't have to assign to stdin at all. freopen( "newin", "r", stdin ) *reassigns* stdin, so that stdin is now fed by "newin" instead of what it was fed by originally. The assignment of the return value of freopen() to stdin is unnecessary.
DevSolar
+1  A: 
freopen("/my/newstdin", "r", stdin);
freopen("/my/newstdout", "w", stdout);
freopen("/my/newstderr", "w", stderr);

... do your stuff

freopen("/dev/stdin", "r", stdin);
...
...

This peaks the needle on my round-peg-square-hole-o-meter, what are you trying to accomplish?

Edit:

Remember that stdin, stdout and stderr are file descriptors 0, 1 and 2 for every newly created process. freopen() should keep the same fd's, just assign new streams to them.

So, a good way to ensure that this is actually doing what you want it to do would be:

printf("Stdout is descriptor %d\n", fileno(stdout));
freopen("/tmp/newstdout", "w", stdout);
printf("Stdout is now /tmp/newstdout and hopefully still fd %d\n",
   fileno(stdout));
freopen("/dev/stdout", "w", stdout);
printf("Now we put it back, hopefully its still fd %d\n",
   fileno(stdout));

I believe this is the expected behavior of freopen(), as you can see, you're still only using three file descriptors (and associated streams).

This would override any shell redirection, as there would be nothing for the shell to redirect. However, its probably going to break pipes. You might want to be sure to set up a handler for SIGPIPE, in case your program finds itself on the blocking end of a pipe (not FIFO, pipe).

So, ./your_program --stdout /tmp/stdout.txt --stderr /tmp/stderr.txt should be easily accomplished with freopen() and keeping the same actual file descriptors. What I don't understand is why you'd need to put them back once changing them? Surely, if someone passed either option, they would want it to persist until the program terminated?

Tim Post
I'm trying to add a way for my program to redirect it's own standard input and output, for people who aren't comfortable with their shell's redirection.
Chris Lutz
Yes, freopen() is going to be your friend for that.
Tim Post
+1  A: 

First of all, thanks for your answers, that helped me a lot. If tried the tinkertim's method, but I had to modify it a bit to get it to work: I used /dev/tty instead of /dev/stdout. I don't know why it doesn't work with stdout (which is a link to /proc/self/fd/1):

freopen("log.txt","w",stdout);
...
...
freopen("/dev/tty","w",stdout);

By using /dev/tty the output is redirected to the terminal from where the app was launched.

Hope this info is useful.