I am looking at this sub-expression (this is in JavaScript):
(?:^|.....)
I know that ? means "zero or one times" when it follows a character, but not sure what it means in this context.
I am looking at this sub-expression (this is in JavaScript):
(?:^|.....)
I know that ? means "zero or one times" when it follows a character, but not sure what it means in this context.
?: Generally indicates making the group a non capture. You can do some research here.
I'm almost positive any regex engine should but when I switch between engines I run into some quirks.
Edit: This should be the case, non captures seems to work fine.
You're probably seeing it in this context
(?:...)
It means that the group won't be captured or used for back-references.
EDIT: To reflect your modified question:
(?:^|....)
means "match the beginning of the line or match ..." but don't capture the group or use it for back-references.
(?:some stuff)
means that you don't want to match the expression in the parentheses separately. Normally the pieces of a regexp grouped in parentheses are grouped and can be referenced individually (this is called using backreferences).
"(?:x) Matches 'x' but does not remember the match."
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/Core_JavaScript_1.5_Guide/Regular_Expressions
When working with groups, you often have several options that modify the behavior of the group:
(foo) // default behavior, matches "foo" and stores a back-reference
(?:foo) // non-capturing group: matches "foo", but doesn't store a back-ref
(?i:foo) // matches "foo" case-insensitively
(?=foo) // matches "foo", but does not advance the current position
// ("positive zero-width look-ahead assertion")
(?!foo) // matches anything but "foo", and does not advance the position
// ("negative zero-width look-ahead assertion")
to name a few.
They all begin with "?", which is the way to indicate a group modifier. The question mark has nothing to do with optionality in this case.
It simply says:
(?:^foo) // match "foo" at the start of the line, but do not store a back-ref
Sometimes it's just overkill to store a back-reference to some part of the match that you are not going to use anyway. When the group is there only to make a complex expression atomic (e.g. it should either match or fail as a whole), storing a back-reference is an unnecessary waste of resources that can even slow down the regex a bit. And sometimes, you just want to be group 1 the first group relevant to you, instead of the first group in the regex.
It flags the (parenthetical) group as a non-capturing group.
The notation for a non-capturing group is:
(?:<expresson>)
In the instance you presented, the caret (^) is part of the expression not part of the capturing group notation. And this instance it's not a special character either.
It looks like they're using an 'or' operator (the pipe) with the caret. So they're looking to match something that is a caret or whatever was on the right of the pipe, but not capture the expression as a group (accomplished with the ?:
in the beginning of the grouping characters.
Non-capturing groups allow you to group an expression in a way that won't be back-refernceable, and will also increase performance of the expression.