Should GC.SuppressFinalize be called on objects that do not have a finalizer?

Question

For some reason FXCop seems to think I should be calling GC.SuppressFinalize in Dispose, regardless of whether I have a finalizer or not.

Am I missing something? Is there a reason to call GC.SuppressFinalize on objects that have no finalizer defined?

Answer 1

All objects have a finalizer method, even if you have not implemented one by using a c# destructor (which is not actually guaranteed to be called by the GC). It's just good practice to supress the call if you have implemented IDisposable because that means you have decided to perform the finalization explictly.

devx article

Answer 2

There is always a finalizer in IL - System.Object.Finalize() exists in every class, so if you make a custom class, it has a finalizer you want to suppress.

If you're implementing IDisposable, you should prevent this from running, since in theory you're doing the cleanup already.

Answer 3

I don't see any need to call SuppressFinalize() if there's no finalizer defined. If you want to be defensive then it can be good to have a finalizer as well as Dispose(), so you don't need to rely on clients to always call Dispose(). Then you won't leak resources when they forget.

Answer 4

There's no need to call GC.SuppressFinalize(this) in Dispose, unless:

• You are the base class that implements virtual Dispose methods intended for overriding (again, it might not be your responsibility even here, but you might want to do it in that case)
• You have a finalizer yourself. Technically, every class in .NET has a finalizer, but if the only finalizer present is the one in Object, then the object is not considered to need finalizing and isn't put on the finalization list upon GC

I would say, assuming you don't have any of the above cases, that you can safely ignore that message.