views:

401

answers:

3

I need to implement the method:

object GetFactory(Type type);

This method needs to return a Func<T> where typeparam 'T' is the 'type'.

So, my problem is that I don't know how to create a Func<?> at runtime using reflection. Activator.CreateInstance doesn't work because there are no constructors on delegates.

Any Ideas?

A: 

I think the usual approach would be to make the "dumb" version be the thing that you spoof at runtme, and then provide a helper extension method to provide the type-safe version on top of it.

Daniel Earwicker
So, this is in the bowels of an IoC container, and I have to return the object as a strongly typed dependency, not necessarily knowing that what was requested was a Func<T> (it could be a Uri or string).
Craig Wilson
+7  A: 

You use Delegate.CreateDelegate, i.e. from a MethodInfo; below, I've hard-coded, but you would use some logic, or Expression, to get the actual creation method:

using System;
using System.Reflection;
class Foo {}

static class Program
{
    static Func<T> GetFactory<T>()
    {
        return (Func<T>)GetFactory(typeof(T));
    }
    static object GetFactory(Type type)
    {
        Type funcType = typeof(Func<>).MakeGenericType(type);
        MethodInfo method = typeof(Program).GetMethod("CreateFoo",
            BindingFlags.NonPublic | BindingFlags.Static);
        return Delegate.CreateDelegate(funcType, method);
    }
    static Foo CreateFoo() { return new Foo(); }
    static void Main()
    {
        Func<Foo> factory = GetFactory<Foo>();
        Foo foo = factory();
    }
}

For non-static methods, there is an overload of Delegate.CreateDelegate that accepts the target instance.

Marc Gravell
Mark, I don't actually know what T is. If I knew what T is, this would be easy.
Craig Wilson
You mean within the non-generic method? I'll update...
Marc Gravell
I modified the question to better state my problem.
Craig Wilson
Not exactly what I needed , but this pushed me down the right path. Thanks for your help.
Craig Wilson
'twas the best I could do given the available information...
Marc Gravell
Oooh, was playing with reflection the other day and wondered if there was a way to describe a generic type definition in code, and now I know: List<>, which presumably can only appear inside typeof?
Daniel Earwicker
@Earwicker: correct; you simply omit all the type-args - for example, KeyValuePair<,> instead of KeyValuePair<TKey,TValue>
Marc Gravell
A: 

you could create Expression objects instead of a func, and compile() the expression to get a Func delegate.

Joachim Kerschbaumer