What is the "base class" for C# numeric value types?

Question

Say I want to have a method that takes any kind of number, is there a base class (or some other concept) that I can use?

As far as I know I have to make overloads for all the different numeric types (Int32, Int16, Byte, UInt32, Double, Float, Decimal, etc). This seems awfully tedious. Either that or use the type "object" and throw exceptions if they are not convertable or assignable to a double - which is pretty bad as it means no compile time checking.

UPDATE: OK thanks for the comments, you are right Scarecrow and Marc, in fact declaring it as Double actually works for all except Decimal.

So the answer I was looking for is Double - it acts like a base class here since most numeric types are assignable to it. (I guess Decimal is not assignable to Double, as it could get too big.)

public void TestFormatDollars() {
 int i = 5;
 string str = FormatDollars(i);   // this is OK
 byte b = 5;
 str = FormatDollars(b);     // this is OK
 decimal d = 5;
 str = FormatDollars(d);     // this does not compile - decimal is not assignable to double
}

public static string FormatDollars(double num) {
 return "$" + num;
}

Answer 1

There isn't one (or at least, not one that just means "numbers"). You could use:

void Foo<T>(T value) where T : struct {...}

But that allows any struct - not just numbers. If you want to do arithmetic, generic operators may be of use. Other than that; overloads it the most viable option.

Answer 2

The base class of the numeric types is ValueType.

Unfortunately that still won't help you: DateTime, bool, Enum and hundreds of other types also derive from ValueType. There's no NumericType base class in .NET.

Answer 3

The short answer is: Numeric types are value types, hence they derive from System.ValueType. The full answer is: you should read this article from MSDN. Moreover I think that you should read C# language reference :). Value type not equals numeric type, because values types include also structures and enumerations.

Answer 4

Are overloaded method signitures out of the question here? If you want a constrained group of methods to performe the same task you could voerload the public method and call a private method that takes any number via casting the input to a double.

Answer 5

The answer is: you don't need to provide overloads for ALL the numeric types, just for Double and Decimal. All others (except maybe some very unusually large ones) will be automatically converted to these.

Not a base class but in fact that was the red herring. The base class System.ValueType doesn't help much as it includes types that are not numerics. The language reference i was reading was what got me confused in the first place :)

(I was just looking for who to attribute the answer to and it was a combination of Scarecrow and Marc Gravell, but since they were comments i have put the answer here)