Unfortunately, custom brushes are not supported in WPF (the brush types are marked 'internal' and cannot be inherited from), so creating a brush that is a mixture of two brushes that can be used from XAML like a normal SolidColorBrush is not possible.
As a workaround, you could use a MarkupExtension to simulate the behaviour of a custom brush, which allows you to use XAML syntax and provide a custom value, which allows us to use the built-in SolidColorBrush (no custom brush necessary) set to the value you get when mixing two colors:
/// <summary>
/// Markup extension to mix two SolidColorBrushes together to produce a new SolidColorBrush.
/// </summary>
[MarkupExtensionReturnType(typeof(SolidColorBrush))]
public class MixedColorBrush : MarkupExtension, INotifyPropertyChanged
{
/// <summary>
/// The foreground mix color; defaults to white.
/// If not changed, the result will always be white.
/// </summary>
private SolidColorBrush foreground = Brushes.White;
/// <summary>
/// The background mix color; defaults to black.
/// If not set, the result will be the foreground color.
/// </summary>
private SolidColorBrush background = Brushes.Black;
/// <summary>
/// PropertyChanged event for WPF binding.
/// </summary>
public event PropertyChangedEventHandler PropertyChanged;
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets the foreground mix color.
/// </summary>
public SolidColorBrush Foreground
{
get
{
return this.foreground;
}
set
{
this.foreground = value;
this.NotifyPropertyChanged("Foreground");
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Gets or sets the background mix color.
/// </summary>
public SolidColorBrush Background
{
get
{
return this.background;
}
set
{
this.background = value;
this.NotifyPropertyChanged("Background");
}
}
/// <summary>
/// Returns a SolidColorBrush that is set as the value of the
/// target property for this markup extension.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="serviceProvider">Object that can provide services for the markup extension.</param>
/// <returns>The object value to set on the property where the extension is applied.</returns>
public override object ProvideValue(IServiceProvider serviceProvider)
{
if (this.foreground != null && this.background != null)
{
// Create a new brush as a composite of the old ones
// This does simple non-perceptual additive color, e.g
// blue + red = magenta, but you can swap in a different
// algorithm to do subtractive color (red + yellow = orange)
return new SolidColorBrush(this.foreground.Color + this.background.Color);
}
// If either of the brushes was set to null, return an empty (white) brush.
return new SolidColorBrush();
}
/// <summary>
/// Raise the property changed event.
/// </summary>
/// <param name="propertyName">Name of the property which has changed.</param>
protected void NotifyPropertyChanged(string propertyName)
{
if (this.PropertyChanged != null)
{
this.PropertyChanged(this, new PropertyChangedEventArgs(propertyName));
}
}
}
Which can then be used from XAML as you would a normal brush:
<Grid>
<Grid.Background>
<local:MixedColorBrush Foreground="Blue" Background="Red"/>
</Grid.Background>
</Grid>
Or by using the markup extension syntax:
<Grid Background="{local:MixedColorBrush Foreground=Blue, Background=Red}">
The downside to this approach is that you cannot use DynamicResource or StaticResource references to bind the values to other resources in your application. MarkupExtension is not a DependencyObject, and resource binding only works on DependencyObjects; the built-in Brushes are DependencyObjects, which is why binding works with traditional brushes.