views:

2857

answers:

2

I have and old(ish) C# method I wrote that takes a number and converts it to any base:

string ConvertToBase(int number, char[] baseChars);

It's not all that super speedy and neat. Is there a good, known way of achieving this in .NET?

EDIT: I should clarify - I'm looking for something that allows me to use any base with an arbitrary string of characters to use.

This only allows bases 16, 10, 8 and 2:

Convert.ToString(1, x);

I want to use this to achieve a massively high base taking advantage of numbers, all lower case and all upper case letters. Like in this thread, but for C# not JavaScript.

Does anyone know of a good and efficient way of doing this in C#?

+10  A: 

Convert.ToString can be used to convert a number to its equivalent string representation in a specified base.

Example:

string binary = Convert.ToString(5, 2); // convert 5 to its binary representation
Console.WriteLine(binary);              // prints 101

However, as pointed out by the comments, Convert.ToString only supports the following limited - but typically sufficient - set of bases: 2, 8, 10, or 16.

Update (to meet the requirement to convert to any base):

I'm not aware of any method in the BCL which is capable to convert numbers to any base so you would have to write your own small utility function. A simple sample would look like that (note that this surely can be made faster by replacing the string concatenation):

class Program
{
    static void Main(string[] args)
    {
        // convert to binary
        string binary = IntToString(42, new char[] { '0', '1' });

        // convert to hexadecimal
        string hex = IntToString(42, 
            new char[] { '0', '1', '2', '3', '4', '5', '6', '7', '8', '9',
                         'A', 'B', 'C', 'D', 'E', 'F'});

        // convert to sexagesimal
        string xx = IntToString(42, 
            new char[] { '0','1','2','3','4','5','6','7','8','9',
            'A','B','C','D','E','F','G','H','I','J','K','L','M','N','O','P','Q','R','S','T','U','V','W','X','Y','Z',
            'a','b','c','d','e','f','g','h','i','j','k','l','m','n','o','p','q','r','s','t','u','v','w','x'});
    }

    public static string IntToString(int value, char[] baseChars)
    {
        string result = string.Empty;
        int targetBase = baseChars.Length;

        do
        {
            result = baseChars[value % targetBase] + result;
            value = value / targetBase;
        } 
        while (value > 0);

        return result;
    }

    /// <summary>
    /// An optimized method using an array as buffer instead of 
    /// string concatenation. This is faster for return values having 
    /// a length > 1.
    /// </summary>
    public static string IntToStringFast(int value, char[] baseChars)
    {
        // 32 is the worst cast buffer size for base 2 and int.MaxValue
        int i = 32;
        char[] buffer = new char[i];
        int targetBase= baseChars.Length;

        do
        {
            buffer[--i] = baseChars[value % targetBase];
            value = value / targetBase;
        }
        while (value > 0);

        char[] result = new char[32 - i];
        Array.Copy(buffer, i, result, 0, 32 - i);

        return new string(result);
    }
}

Update 2 (Performance Improvement)

Using an array buffer instead of string concatenation to build the result string gives a performance improvement especially on large number (see method IntToStringFast). In the best case (i.e. the longest possible input) this method is roughly three times faster. However, for 1-digit numbers (i.e. 1-digit in the target base), IntToString will be faster.

0xA3
It should be noted that this only supports bases 2,8,10,16 - not the "any" in the question. 'cos you never know when you'll need sexagesimal ;-p
Marc Gravell
Sexagesimal sounds like fun.
rein
With a targetBase of 60, and a value of 12345, This line in the IntToString method: value = value / targetBase;would make value = 203.75. Is this correct? Shouldn't it keep it as a whole number?
TandemAdam
@TandemAdam: No, `12345 / 60` results in a value of `205`. The correct result of 205.75 is truncated as this is a division of integer values.
0xA3
Ahhh! I get it! Thanks for clarifying!
TandemAdam
Awesome. But where's the inverse function? :/
ashes999
I have a first-pass inverse function here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3579970/whats-an-efficient-inversion-of-the-convert-to-arbitrary-base-c-function/3579977#3579977
ashes999
+1  A: 

Could this class from this forum post help you?

public class BaseConverter { 

public static string ToBase(string number, int start_base, int target_base) { 

  int base10 = this.ToBase10(number, start_base); 
  string rtn = this.FromBase10(base10, target_base); 
  return rtn; 

} 

public static int ToBase10(string number, int start_base) { 

  if (start_base < 2 || start_base > 36) return 0; 
  if (start_base == 10) return Convert.ToInt32(number); 

  char[] chrs = number.ToCharArray(); 
  int m = chrs.Length - 1; 
  int n = start_base; 
  int x; 
  int rtn = 0; 

  foreach(char c in chrs) { 

    if (char.IsNumber(c)) 
      x = int.Parse(c.ToString()); 
    else 
      x = Convert.ToInt32(c) - 55; 

    rtn += x * (Convert.ToInt32(Math.Pow(n, m))); 

    m--; 

  } 

  return rtn; 

} 

public static string FromBase10(int number, int target_base) { 

  if (target_base < 2 || target_base > 36) return ""; 
  if (target_base == 10) return number.ToString(); 

  int n = target_base; 
  int q = number; 
  int r; 
  string rtn = ""; 

  while (q >= n) { 

    r = q % n; 
    q = q / n; 

    if (r < 10) 
      rtn = r.ToString() + rtn; 
    else 
      rtn = Convert.ToChar(r + 55).ToString() + rtn; 

  } 

  if (q < 10) 
    rtn = q.ToString() + rtn; 
  else 
    rtn = Convert.ToChar(q + 55).ToString() + rtn; 

  return rtn; 

} 

}

Totally untested... let me know if it works! (Copy-pasted it in case the forum post goes away or something...)

Svish
Close.. I'll have a play later. It'll need a bit of work to be able to take any chars, but it's a step in the right direction. I'll compare the speed against my own method!
joshcomley
Remember to share it if here if you improve it. Someone else might want ot too =)
Svish
Of course :) will likely be over the weekend
joshcomley