views:

1026

answers:

6

I have a cpu intensive task that I need to run on the client. Ideally, I'd like to be able to invoke the function and trigger progress events using jquery so I can update the UI.

I know javascript does not support threading, but I've seen a few promising articles trying to mimic threading using setTimeout.

What is the best approach to use for this? Thanks.

+1  A: 

I suggest using setTimeout, or use AJAX, where the cpu intensive tasks are executed server side.

An example of setTimeout is:

function myCpuIntenseTask()
{
    //Code
}
setTimeout("myCpuIntenseTask();", 1);
Time Machine
Unfortunately I need to interact w/ a COM object installed on the client to extract data, so server side is out.
Rob
Then use setTimeout ;-)
Time Machine
+3  A: 

Depending on what your requirements are, you may get off easily by using Gears. Gears supports threads, which could do what you want.

As you mentioned, setTimeout is the other option. Depending on the type of your task, you can hand off each iteration of a loop to a separate setTimeout call with some spacing in between, or you may need to separate pieces of your main algorithm into separate functions which can be called one by one in a same manner as you'd call each iteration.

Jani Hartikainen
+1, but gears 'workers' aren't exactly what other environment calls 'threads'.
Javier
Firefox 3.5 also has W3 standardized workers. See my answer for links.
Blixt
A: 

My strongest recommendation is to display a simple loading.gif during the operation. User often accepts some duration if they have been "told" that it could take some time.

Ajaxload - Ajax loading gif generator

Andersson
+3  A: 

Basically, what you want to do is to divide the operation into pieces. So say you have 10 000 items you want to process, store them in a list and then process a small number of them with a small delay between each call. Here's a simple structure you could use:

function performTask(items, numToProcess, processItem) {
    var pos = 0;
    // This is run once for every numToProcess items.
    function iteration() {
        // Calculate last position.
        var j = Math.min(pos + numToProcess, items.length);
        // Start at current position and loop to last position.
        for (var i = pos; i < j; i++) {
            processItem(items, i);
        }
        // Increment current position.
        pos += numToProcess;
        // Only continue if there are more items to process.
        if (pos < items.length)
            setTimeout(iteration, 10); // Wait 10 ms to let the UI update.
    }
    iteration();
}

performTask(
    // A set of items.
    ['a', 'b', 'c', 'd', 'e', 'f', 'g', 'h', 'i', 'j', 'k', 'l', 'm', 'n', 'o'],
    // Process two items every iteration.
    2,
    // Function that will do stuff to the items. Called once for every item. Gets
    // the array with items and the index of the current item (to prevent copying
    // values around which is unnecessary.)
    function (items, index) {
        // Do stuff with items[index]
        // This could also be inline in iteration for better performance.
    });

Also note that Google Gears has support to do work on a separate thread. Firefox 3.5 also introduced its own workers that do the same thing (although they follow the W3 standard, while Google Gears uses its own methods.)

Blixt
Thanks. This worked very well for me, but I was working with an array of data so it might not be the best solution for everyone.
Rob
A: 

This is a very basic example of how to create threads in JavaScript. Note that is is up to you to interrupt your thread functions (yeld instruction). If you want, you can use a setTimeout instead of my while loop to run the scheduler periodically. Note also that this example only works with JavaScript version 1.7+ (firefox 3+) you can try it here: http://jslibs.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/jseval.html

//// thread definition
function Thread( name ) {

    for ( var i = 0; i < 5; i++ ) {

        Print(i+' ('+name+')');
        yield;
    }
}

//// thread management
var threads = [];

// thread creation
threads.push( new Thread('foo') );
threads.push( new Thread('bar') );

// scheduler
while (threads.length) {

    var thread = threads.shift();
    try {
        thread.next();
        threads.push(thread);
    } catch(ex if ex instanceof StopIteration) { }
}

The output is:

0 (foo) 0 (bar) 1 (foo) 1 (bar) 2 (foo) 2 (bar) 3 (foo) 3 (bar) 4 (foo) 4 (bar)
Soubok
That's really neat although not feasible unless the user can be forced to use Firefox 3+. `=)` I really like your JavaScript evaluator though, I'll bookmark that one! `=)`
Blixt
Hi, thanks ! Perhaps you could have a look at the jslibs project: http://code.google.com/p/jslibs
Soubok
+1  A: 

If you can enforce the browser to be used, or you otherwise already know it to be a new version of Firefox, you could use the new WebWorkers from Mozilla. It allows you to spawn new threads.

Sinan Taifour