Hi guys
I am having more than a little difficulty trying to debug why MVC is not binding correctly in a given case I have...
Basically, I have my action which receives a complex object which in turn has a complex child object - Activity.Location.State (Where Activity is the complex object that the action expects, Location is a complex child object and State is just a string).
Now I set up a test project which as far as I can tell exactly mimics the actually scenario I have, in this test case the binding works... But in my actually project, the binding to Activity works but not to Location... By putting break points within the Locaiton property I can tell that MVC is retrieving the complex Location object from the Activity, but its not setting any of the properties...
I am trying to debug the issue but I need access to the MVC v2 preview 2 symbols which I can't seem to track down... I would like to see what it is actually doing once it pulls out the location object (for some reason I think it might be failing internally but swallowing the exception).
Any ideas on what I could do here...
Cheers Anthony
UPDATE:
Ok I did what J.W. suggested and directly reference the MVC project...
I found the problem and there was one very small difference that I overlooked... As I result I found out that MVC does not currently support multiple levels of INTERFACE inheritance when it comes to model binding... See the following...
//MODEL
public class Location : ILocation
{
...
}
public interface ILocation : ILocationCore
{
...
}
public interface ILocationCore //In my sample I didn't have this second level interface
{
...
//MVC doesn't find any of these properties
...
}
public class Activity : IActivity
{
...
}
public interface IActivity : IActivityCore
{
ILocation Location { get; set; } //MVC finds this and reads its meta type as an ILocation
//Also the implementation of this Location within Activity will always return a instance - our IoC takes care of that, so MVC should never have to create the instance
}
public interface IActivityCore
{
...
}
//CONTROLLER
public ActionResult Create(Activity activity)
{
}
Hence what I have found is that MVC finds the Location and reads its meta type as an ILocation, but when GetModelProperties is run within the DefaultModelBinder the following occurs -
protected virtual PropertyDescriptorCollection GetModelProperties(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext) {
return GetTypeDescriptor(controllerContext, bindingContext).GetProperties();
//This return no properties
}
protected virtual ICustomTypeDescriptor GetTypeDescriptor(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext) {
return new AssociatedMetadataTypeTypeDescriptionProvider(bindingContext.ModelType).GetTypeDescriptor(bindingContext.ModelType);
//bindingContext.ModelType - is ILocation
}
Hence I am assuming at this point that TypeDescriptionProvider doesn't support this style of inheritance, which i am quite surprised by. Also looking at the v1 source it looks like this was introduced with v2 - but v1 mightn't have been able to support what I am trying to do anyway.
I wouldn't say that this is really a bug, but I tried replacing my the interfaces with concrete classes and it worked fine. Hence the behavior isn't really what I would expect and is a little inconsistent.
Any thoughts??? I would have thought that this inheritance was not fairly standard but would occur often enough to be catered for. Thanks for the reply.
Cheers