views:

189

answers:

4

I'm required to make a website function exactly the same on other browsers as it does in IE6. Part of the current code looks similar to this:

<script>
function myFunc(){
 location.href="mailto:[email protected]&body=Hello!";
 location.href="newPage.html";
}
</script>
<body onload="myFunc();">
</body>

in IE, this causes the mail client to open with the specified message prepared, and then redirects the browser to newPage.html. Other browsers, however, only redirect to newPage.html. How can I achieve this effect (opening the mail client and then doing a page redirect) consistently across browsers?
As a note, I've also tried to accomplish this using meta refresh, but was unsuccessful.

+1  A: 

This will work only if the client's browser knows which E-Mail client to open for mailto: links in the first place. If the user uses a web-based client that is not registered with the browser, nothing will happen.

Also, it could be that security settings prevent mailto: links from opening programmatically, or will prevent it in the future.

I wouldn't rely on this to work either way, only as a nice optional convenience function.

Anyway, to answer your question, can you try setting a timeout between the two calls? Maybe the location refresh is just too quick for the browser to catch up.

location.href="mailto:[email protected]&body=Hello!";
setTimeout(function(){ location.href = 'newPage.html' },  500);
Pekka
lol you beat me while I was testing my answer. I found that a timeout interval of 0 works fine at least in Chrome. I'm also out of votes or I would +1 :-)
Andy E
LOL! That's three of us now, my friend. :-) But I still like Mic's answer.
T.J. Crowder
+4  A: 

Try using something like:

<a href="mailto:[email protected]" onclick="window.location.href='np.html'">send</a>

Instead of at the onload.

Mic
On now *that's* smart. But I'd include a slight delay before changing the window location in the `onclick` handler.
T.J. Crowder
Generally speaking, I actually much prefer this solution, but in this specific case I think it's better for me to stick with the javascript based solution.
T.R.
This is really smart. +1.
Pekka
Nice solution, indeed. But please don't forget the final " after the second url. ;)
Marcel Korpel
@Marcel I added the missing "
Mic
+1  A: 

On the whole, I tend to think security settings will get in your way and would recommend just giving the user a boring old-fashioned mailto link to click. (Edit: Perhaps one set up like Mic suggests.)

That said, I wonder if things become any more reliable if you introduce a delay:

function myFunc() {
    location.href = "mailto:[email protected]&body=Hello!";
    setTimeout(function() {
        location.href = "newPage.html";
    }, 500);
}
T.J. Crowder
+1  A: 

Changing the href property will start a location load, changing it again afterwards will cancel the previous navigation.

It appears that IE6 will start the e-mail client immediately upon setting the property, then continue the javascript execution. Other browsers appear to do things differently, and the second location load will cancel the first.

I managed to work around this in Chrome with a timer, it might work for other browsers too:

function myFunc(){ 
  location.href="mailto:[email protected]&body=Hello!"; 
  window.setTimeout(function () { location.href="newPage.html" }, 0); 
} 
Andy E
Jinx! But I think I beat you by seconds... ;-)
T.J. Crowder
32 seconds to be exact lol. Need to start exercising my fingers more ;-)
Andy E
Yeesh, and he gives it to you instead of me. The bum. ;-) 32 seconds! Eons!
T.J. Crowder
Sorry, had to choose one!
T.R.
Stop whining, I beat you *both* by 4 minutes! :) On the other hand, @Andy E you took the time to actually test it, so the mark went to the right person.
Pekka
@T.R.: And you chose the right one. @Pekka: Oh, I agree (about Andy), I'm just joking around. :-) (But for the record: I'm pretty sure I posted my answer before you edited yours.)
T.J. Crowder
@T.J.Crowder: Right, I edited mine a few minutes later, you're right.
Pekka
@Pekka: You beat my answer with your edit, so it must have been really close. I have questions sorted in order of oldest so that I mark the first correct one but I supposed that doesn't always work with edits. @T.J. Crowder: I knew you were joking ;-)
Andy E