An analysis from a colleague with UML diagrams contains the following:
0..°
I'm familiar with 0..* and such but not with the previous. Any ideas? Is it a typo? It's used throughout the document.
Why the hell did I get -1 for this?! It is a friggin typo!
Cipi
2010-03-01 14:11:46
+1
A:
Assuming that this appears as a multiplicity: It's a typo or some sort of conversion error. According to the UML spec, the upper bound of a multiplicity is of type UnlimitedNatural, and
A LiteralUnlimitedNatural is shown either as a sequence of digits or as an asterisk (*), where an asterisk denotes unlimited (and not infinity).
Michael Borgwardt
2010-03-01 13:32:33