tags:

views:

79

answers:

6

The company where I work let me choose the IDE to work with Oracle.

I may choose betwwen

  • SQL Developper
  • Toad
  • PL/SQL Developper

What are the advantages and disavantages of each one ?

The price is not a concern. Licenses are already paid...

A: 

I only used SQL Developer and Toad in the past. Toad was for me the best experience and seemed the most stable one to me.

Grz, Kris.

XIII
A: 

My opinion is OraEdit is much better than the ones you mentioned.

http://www.dkgas.com/oraeditpro.htm

Sam
+1  A: 

I worked with both SQL developer and Toad for Oracle and both worked well. Honestly I'd choose SQL developer - I liked it more. Why? Not sure, maybe I was more happy with fact that it's 'official' and I didn't face any compatibility issues.

But my requiremenets were fit by both.

Xorty
+1  A: 

I haven't used TOAD in a few years now, but when our shop converted to PL/SQL Developer I found that I missed some of the more DBA-oriented features TOAD provides. I do like PL/SQL Developer a lot. If you're primarily concerned with programming, I'd say there isn't a whole lot of difference between the two. The one thing I really miss in TOAD is the ability to have independent database connections within the same instance of TOAD. In PL/SQL Developer, you have to open a different window for each instance you're connecting to, or switch connections (that's annoying). I find the SQL Developer (Oracle's product) seems to be continually lagging behind the competition whenever I go to use it.

DCookie
A: 

Toad is fine for many things, not really a DBA-centric tool. It's easy to set up and easy to use. Not sure I love it....but it's easy.

ssnyder
A: 

I'm a sqldeveloper fan. I've used toad, and sqlnavigator and while they are way more featureful, sqldeveloper provides the right amount of functionality while not breaking the bank. Also, I don't have to convince clients to purchase a license for it for their developers.

jskaggz
Sorry, missed the part in the original post about money being no object.
jskaggz