tags:

views:

105

answers:

3
alert(myVar1);
return false;
var myVar1;

above code throws error in IE, FF and Opera stating that return statement has to come in the function. But it works (shows undefined) in Safari and Chrome.

[The above code has been written in global scope. Outside all the functions]

Any reason?

+3  A: 

This code makes little sense:

  • The var myVar1 will never be ran.
  • The return false; will not return a thing since you're not in a function

Opera, IE and FF are right to throw an error because this code is really not valid since you're not able to return unless you are in a function.

If it works in Safari and Chrome it must be because the javascript engine they use is ready to handle buggy code. My guess would be that they see the "return" and drop or replace it with some kind of break.

More information about functions: http://www.w3schools.com/js/js_functions.asp

marcgg
Chrome errors for me when I use a *return* statement outside of a function.
Andy E
var myVar1 will be always be run thanks to hoisting
AutomatedTester
@marcgg irrespective of the fact that return statement is not allowed without a function, hoising should have happened here and I should have got an alert saying undefined. I don't see that happening when I have a return statement.
alter
@alter, It's a compile error, not a runtime error.
strager
+1  A: 

In javaScript Variables are moved to the top of script and then run. So when you run it will do

var myVar1;
alert(myVar1);
return false;

This is because javascript doesnt really have a true sense of lexical scoping. This is why its considered best practise to have all your variables declared at the top of the area they will be used to prevent hoisting causing a problem. JSLint will moan about this.

This is a good article that explains it http://www.adequatelygood.com/2010/2/JavaScript-Scoping-and-Hoisting

The return is invalid. If you want to do a true hoisting example (taken from the link above) do

var foo = 1; 
function bar() { 
    if (!foo) { 
        var foo = 10; 
    } 
    alert(foo); 
} 
bar();

This will alert 10

EDIT AFTER COMMENT

Below is my understanding and I have read it somewhere but can't find all the sources that I read so am open to correction.

This Alerts thanks to the differences in the JavaScript JIT. TraceMonkey(http://ejohn.org/blog/tracemonkey/) I believe will take the JavaScript and do a quick static analysis and then do JIT and then try run it. If that fails then obviously nothing works.

V8 doesnt do the static analysis and moves to the JIT then runs so something. Its more akin to python. If you run the script in the Developer console(ctrl+shift+j in windows) in Chrome it will throw an error but also run to give you the alert.

AutomatedTester
@Automater Tester, your code is perfectly right and its a very nice example of hoisting in javascript. But what I want to know is that why return didn't throw error in chrome and safari
alter
@alter I have added more info for you.
AutomatedTester
"In javaScript Variables are moved to the top of script and then run." Actually, variable *names* (and not assignments/definitions) are "hoisted" to the top of the containing scope (whichever is nearest; `if` et. al. do *not* create a "scope" in this sense).
strager
@strager you are correct, only the names are hoisted. When I put "and then run" I meant the whole script.
AutomatedTester
A: 

Section 12.9 (page 75) of ECMA-262 edition 3 states:

An ECMAScript program is considered syntactically incorrect if it contains a return statement that is not within a FunctionBody.

That is, a return outside of a function is a syntax error. If a syntax error occurs, no code is run. Think about your example as if you had written:

alert(myVar1);
return false;
syntax error))))))))))))))))));

In addition, section 16 (page 157) states:

An implementation may treat any instance of the following kinds of runtime errors as a syntax error and therefore report it early:

  • Improper uses of return, break, and continue.

Firefox's engine et. al. (i.e. those JavaScript implementations which allow return in the global scope) may be conforming, assuming the following clause (in the same section) allows for implementation definition of return in the global scope:

An implementation shall report all errors as specified, except for the following:

  • An implementation may provide additional types, values, objects, properties, and functions beyond those described in this specification. This may cause constructs (such as looking up a variable in the global scope) to have implementation-defined behaviour instead of throwing an error (such as ReferenceError).
strager