views:

1179

answers:

3

Is it possible in Ruby to get a reference to methods of an object ( I would like to know if this can be done without procs/lambdas ) , for example , consider the following code :


class X
  def initialize
    @map = {}
    setup_map
  end

  private
  def setup_map
    # @map["a"] = get reference to a method
    # @map["b"] = get reference to b method
    # @map["c"] = get referebce to c method
  end

  public
  def call(a)
    @map["a"](a) if a > 10
    @map["b"](a) if a > 20
    @map["c"](a) if a > 30
  end

  def a(arg)
     puts "a was called with #{arg}"
  end

  def b(arg)
     puts "b was called with #{arg}"
  end

  def c(arg)
    puts "c was called with #{arg}"
  end
end

Is it possible to do such thing ? I would like to avoid procs/lambdas because I want to be able to change the behaviour of A,B,C by subclassing .

+2  A: 

You can do this with lambdas while maintaining the ability to change behavior in subclasses:

class X
  def initialize
    @map = {}
    setup_map
  end

  private
  def setup_map
    @map["a"] = lambda { |a| a(a) }
    @map["b"] = lambda { |a| b(a) }
    @map["c"] = lambda { |a| c(a) }
  end

  public
  def call(a)
    @map["a"].call(a) if a > 10
    @map["b"].call(a) if a > 20
    @map["c"].call(a) if a > 30
  end

  def a(arg)
     puts "a was called with #{arg}"
  end

  def b(arg)
     puts "b was called with #{arg}"
  end

  def c(arg)
    puts "c was called with #{arg}"
  end
end
Zach Langley
This works ! But , is there no way of getting an actual reference to a method ?
Geo
The best you could do is instance.methods and that gives an array of strings.
Samuel
A: 

Ruby methods aren't first-class objects; it implements OO with message passing.

class X
  def call(a)
    self.send(:a, a) if a > 10
    self.send(:b, a) if a > 20
    self.send(:c, a) if a > 30
  end

  def a(arg)
     puts "a was called with #{arg}"
  end

  def b(arg)
     puts "b was called with #{arg}"
  end

  def c(arg)
    puts "c was called with #{arg}"
  end
end

Or just call them directly:

def call(a)
  self.a(a) if a > 10
  self.b(a) if a > 20
  self.c(a) if a > 30
end
Ken
This was a simple example . For the classes I need to write , I will have about 20-30 methods to check . If checks wouldn't be very stylish , right ?
Geo
I assumed the if-statements were proxies for a switch or hash lookup. "send(:a, a)" looks simpler than "@map["a"][arg]" to me, even more so if there are many of them.
Ken
+9  A: 

You want Object#method:

---------------------------------------------------------- Object#method
     obj.method(sym)    => method
------------------------------------------------------------------------
     Looks up the named method as a receiver in obj, returning a Method 
     object (or raising NameError). The Method object acts as a closure 
     in obj's object instance, so instance variables and the value of 
     self remain available.

        class Demo
          def initialize(n)
            @iv = n
          end
          def hello()
            "Hello, @iv = #{@iv}"
          end
        end

        k = Demo.new(99)
        m = k.method(:hello)
        m.call   #=> "Hello, @iv = 99"

        l = Demo.new('Fred')
        m = l.method("hello")
        m.call   #=> "Hello, @iv = Fred"

Now your code becomes:

private
def setup_map
  @map = {
    'a' => method(:a),
    'b' => method(:b),
    'c' => method(:c)
  }
  # or, more succinctly
  # @map = Hash.new { |_map,name| _map[name] = method(name.to_sym) }
end

public
def call(arg)
  @map["a"][arg] if arg > 10
  @map["b"][arg] if arg > 20
  @map["c"][arg] if arg > 30
end
rampion
Great ! You're the man :)
Geo