Possible Duplicate: Location of parenthesis for auto-executing anonymous JavaScript functions? Question is a duplicate of http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3384504/location-of-parenthesis-for-auto-executing-anonymous-javascript-functions and http://stackoverflow.com/questions/440739/what-do-parentheses-surrounding-a-javascr...
Lets say I have a basic recursive function: function recur(data) { data = data+1; var nothing = function() { recur(data); } nothing(); } How could I do this if I have an anonymous function such as... (function(data){ data = data+1; var nothing = function() { //Something here that calls the func...
I am interested if it's possible using C# to write a code analogous to this Javascript one: var v = (function() { return "some value"; })() The most I could achieve is: Func<string> vf = () => { return "some value"; }; var v = vf(); But I wanted something like this: // Gives error CS0149: Method name expected var v = (() ...
I am reading this function in a book, and I don't understand how the anonymous function is passed the thirst three arguments? This is what I understand function multiplyByTwo(a, b, c, callback) { var i, ar = []; for(i = 0; i < 3; i++) { ar[i] = callback(arguments[i] * 2); } return ar; } but not this myarr = multiplyByTw...
Is there a way that one can implicitly declare top-level variables as global for use in closures? For example, if working with code such as this: $a = 0; //A TOP-LEVEL VARIABLE Alpha::create('myAlpha') ->bind(DataSingleton::getInstance() ->query('c') ) ->addBeta('myBeta', function($obj){ $obj->bind(DataSing...
I've been asking a few questions on this topic recently, so I feel it appropriate to link up the associated question(s). http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4054424/php-closures-and-implicit-global-variable-scope I've got a set of classes that use closures as in the example below (keep in mind I quickly punched together this example for...