Maybe I'm not all there today, but I'm wondering how to get this to work. I'd like to partially specialize range_mutable_iterator and range_const_iterator from the boost library but only for specific types that I'd rather avoid mentioning explicitly, instead only letting the partial specialization be chosen if the enable_if test criteria...
I am using PC-Lint (great tool for static code analysis - see http://www.gimpel.com/) For the following chunk of code: class ASD { protected: template<int N> void foo(); }; template<> inline void ASD::foo<1>() {} template<int N> inline void ASD::foo() {} PC-lint gives me a warning: inline void ASD::foo<1>() {} m...
This question got me thinking. Sometimes it's useful to grab an actual argument from a class template specialization, if it fails to define a public typedef of the argument. In C++03 it's a sign of either bad template design, or contrary design intent, and not particularly common. But variadic templates make typedef coverage impossible, ...
I'm using an C++ "event" class that allowed one or two arguments in the to be called delegates. Lately I've added support for delegates that don't require arguments, however when I specialze the class to use no template arguments I'm still required to add <> afther the class definition. Example usage with one/two arguments: class Exam...
I am working on a template class Array, which accepts another template TRAITS as a parameter. template <typename BASE, typename STRUCT> class Traits { public: typedef BASE BaseType; typedef STRUCT Struct; // .. More here }; template <class TRAITS> class Array { public: typedef TRAI...