views:

2162

answers:

10

I'm starting to learn Python and I've come across generator functions, those that have a yield statement in them. I want to know what types of problems that these functions are really good at solving.

+4  A: 

See the "Motivation" section in PEP 255.

A non-obvious use of generators is creating interruptible functions, which lets you do things like update UI or run several jobs "simultaneously" (interleaved, actually) while not using threads.

Nickolay
+21  A: 

Generators give you lazy evaluation. You use them by iterating over them, either explicitly with 'for' or implicitly by passing it to any function or construct that iterates. You can think of generators as returning multiple items, as if they return a list, but instead of returning them all at once they return them one-by-one, and the generator function is paused until the next item is requested.

Generators are good for calculating large sets of results (in particular calculations involving loops themselves) where you don't know if you are going to need all results, or where you don't want to allocate the memory for all results at the same time. Or for situations where the generator uses another generator, or consumes some other resource, and it's more convenient if that happened as late as possible.

Another use for generators (that is really the same) is to replace callbacks with iteration. In some situations you want a function to do a lot of work and occasionally report back to the caller. Traditionally you'd use a callback function for this. You pass this callback to the work-function and it would periodically call this callback. The generator approach is that the work-function (now a generator) knows nothing about the callback, and merely yields whenever it wants to report something. The caller, instead of writing a separate callback and passing that to the work-function, does all the reporting work in a little 'for' loop around the generator.

For example, say you wrote a 'filesystem search' program. You could perform the search in its entirety, collect the results and then display them one at a time. All of the results would have to be collected before you showed the first, and all of the results would be in memory at the same time. Or you could display the results while you find them, which would be more memory efficient and much friendlier towards the user. The latter could be done by passing the result-printing function to the filesystem-search function, or it could be done by just making the search function a generator and iterating over the result.

If you want to see an example of the latter two approaches, see os.path.walk() (the old filesystem-walking function with callback) and os.walk() (the new filesystem-walking generator.) Of course, if you really wanted to collect all results in a list, the generator approach is trivial to convert to the big-list approach: list(the_generator)

Thomas Wouters
Along these lines, David Beazley has a presentation [http://www.dabeaz.com/generators-uk/] in which he shows grepping using generators. The final code is shown here. [http://www.dabeaz.com/generators-uk/gengrep.py]
hughdbrown
+1  A: 

Basically avoiding call-back functions when iterating over input maintaining state.

See here and here for an overview of what can be done using generators.

+9  A: 

One of the reasons to use generator is to make the solution clearer for some kind of solutions.

The other is to treat results one at a time, avoiding building huge lists of results that you would process separated anyway.

If you have a fibonacci-up-to-n function like this:

# function version
def fibon(n):
    a = b = 1
    result = []
    for i in xrange(n):
        result.append(a)
        a, b = b, a + b
    return result

You can more easily write the function as this:

# generator version
def fibon(n):
    a = b = 1
    for i in xrange(n):
        yield a
        a, b = b, a + b

The function is clearer. And if you use the function like this:

for x in fibon(1000000):
    print x,

in this example, if using the generator version, the whole 1000000 item list won't be created at all, just one value at a time. That would not be the case when using the list version, where a list would be created first.

nosklo
+1  A: 

My favorite uses are "filter" and "reduce" operations.

Let's say we're reading a file, and only want the lines which begin with "##".

def filter2sharps( aSequence ):
    for l in aSequence:
        if l.startswith("##"):
            yield l

We can then use the generator function in a proper loop

source= file( ... )
for line in filter2sharps( source.readlines() ):
    print line
source.close()

The reduce example is similar. Let's say we have a file where we need to locate blocks of <Location>...</Location> lines. [Not HTML tags, but lines that happen to look tag-like.]

def reduceLocation( aSequence ):
    keep= False
    block= None
    for line in aSequence:
        if line.startswith("</Location"):
            block.append( line )
            yield block
            block= None
            keep= False
        elif line.startsWith("<Location"):
            block= [ line ]
            keep= True
        elif keep:
            block.append( line )
        else:
            pass
    if block is not None:
        yield block # A partial block, icky

Again, we can use this generator in a proper for loop.

source = file( ... )
for b in reduceLocation( source.readlines() ):
    print b
source.close()

The idea is that a generator function allows us to filter or reduce a sequence, producing a another sequence one value at a time.

S.Lott
`fileobj.readlines()` would read the entire file to a list in memory, defeating the purpose of using generators.Since file objects are already iterable you can use `for b in your_generator(fileobject):` instead. That way your file will be read one line at a time, to avoid reading whole file.
nosklo
reduceLocation is pretty weird yield'ing a list, why not just yield each line? Also filter and reduce are builtins with expected behaviours (see help in ipython etc.), your usage of "reduce" is the same as filter.
James Antill
Good point on the readlines(). I usually realize that files are first-class line iterators during unit testing.
S.Lott
Actually, the "reduction" is combining multiple individual lines into a composite object. Okay, it's a list, but it's still a reduction taken from the source.
S.Lott
+5  A: 

Buffering. When it is efficient to fetch data in large chunks, but process it in small chunks, then a generator might help:

def bufferedFetch():
  while True:
     buffer = getBigChunkOfData()
     # insert some code to break on 'end of data'
     for i in buffer:    
          yield i

The above lets you easily separate buffering from processing. The consumer function can now just get the values one by one without worrying about buffering.

Rafał Dowgird
A: 

Piles of stuff. Any time you want to generate a sequence of items, but don't want to have to 'materialize' them all into a list at once. For example, you could have a simple generator that returns prime numbers:

def primes():
    primes_found = set()
    primes_found.add(2)
    yield 2
    for i in itertools.count(1):
        candidate = i * 2 + 1
        if not all(candidate % prime for prime in primes_found):
            primes_found.add(candidate)
            yield candidate

You could then use that to generate the products of subsequent primes:

def prime_products():
    primeiter = primes()
    prev = primeiter.next()
    for prime in primeiter:
        yield prime * prev
        prev = prime

These are fairly trivial examples, but you can see how it can be useful for processing large (potentially infinite!) datasets without generating them in advance, which is only one of the more obvious uses.

Nick Johnson
if not any(candidate % prime for prime in primes_found) should be if all(candidate % prime for prime in primes_found)
rjmunro
Yes, I meant to write "if not any(candidate % prime == 0 for prime in primes_found). Yours is slightly neater, though. :)
Nick Johnson
+5  A: 

The simple explanation: Consider a for statement

for item in iterable:
   do_stuff()

A lot of the time, all the items in iterable doesn't need to be there from the start, but can be generated on the fly as they're required. This can be a lot more efficient in both

  • space (you never need to store all the items simultaneously) and
  • time (the iteration may finish before all the items are needed).

Other times, you don't even know all the items ahead of time. For example:

for command in user_input():
   do_stuff_with(command)

You have no way of knowing all the user's commands beforehand, but you can use a nice loop like this if you have a generator handing you commands:

def user_input():
    while True:
        wait_for_command()
        cmd = get_command()
        yield cmd

With generators you can also have iteration over infinite sequences, which is of course not possible when iterating over containers.

dF
A: 

I use generators when our web server is acting as a proxy:

  1. The client requests a proxied url from the server
  2. The server begins to load the target url
  3. The server yields to return the results to the client as soon as it gets them
Brian
+3  A: 

I have found that generators are very helpful in cleaning up your code and by giving you a very unique way to encapsulate and modularize code. In a situation where you need something to constantly spit out values based on its own internal processing and when that something needs to be called from anywhere in your code (and not just within a loop or a block for example), generators are the feature to use.

An abstract example would be a fibonacci number generator that does not live within a loop and when it is called from anywhere will always return the next number in sequence:

def fib():
  first=0
  second=1
  yield first
  yield second

  while 1:
    next=first+second
    yield next
    first=second
    second=next

fibgen1=fib()
fibgen2=fib()

Now you have two fibonacci number generator objects which you can call from anywhere in your code and they will always return ever larger fibonacci numbers in sequence as follows:

>>> fibgen1.next(); fibgen1.next(); fibgen1.next(); fibgen1.next()
0
1
1
2
>>> fibgen2.next(); fibgen2.next()
0
1
>>> fibgen1.next(); fibgen1.next()
3
5

The lovely thing about generators is that they encapsulate state without having to go through the hoops of creating objects. One way of thinking about them is as "functions" which remember their internal state.

I got the fibonacci example from http://www.neotitans.com/resources/python/python-generators-tutorial.html and with a little imagination, you can come up with a lot of other situations where generators make for a great alternative to for-loops and other traditional iteration constructs.

Andz