I know there's no standard C function to do this. I was wondering what are the techniques to to this on Windows and *nix? (Windows XP is my most important OS to do this on right now.)
Thanks for the help!
I know there's no standard C function to do this. I was wondering what are the techniques to to this on Windows and *nix? (Windows XP is my most important OS to do this on right now.)
Thanks for the help!
You can do it by walking the stack backwards. In reality, though, it's frequently easier to add an identifier onto a call stack at the beginning of each function and pop it at the end, then just walk that printing the contents. It's a bit of a PITA, but it works well and will save you time in the end.
There is no platform independent way to do it.
The nearest thing you can do is to run the code without optimizations. That way you can attach to the process (using the visual c++ debugger or GDB) and get a usable stack trace.
glibc provides backtrace() function.
http://www.gnu.org/software/libc/manual/html_node/Backtraces.html
We've used this for our projects:
http://www.codeproject.com/threads/StackWalker.asp
The code is a tad messy IMHO, but it works well. Windows only.
For Windows check the StackWalk64() API (also on 32bit Windows). For UNIX you should use the OS' native way to do it, or fallback to glibc's backtrace(), if availabe.
Note however that taking a Stacktrace in native code is rarely a good idea - not because it is not possible, but because you're usally trying to achieve the wrong thing.
Most of the time people try to get a stacktrace in, say, an exceptional circumstance, like when an exception is caught, an assert fails or - worst and most wrong of them all - when you get a fatal "exception" or signal like a segmentation violation.
Considering the last issue, most of the APIs will require you to explicitly allocate memory or may do it internally. Doing so in the fragile state in which your program may be currently in, may acutally make things even worse. For example, the crash report (or coredump) will not reflect the actual cause of the problem, but your failed attempt to handle it).
I assume you're trying to achive that fatal-error-handling thing, as most people seem to try that when it comes to getting a stacktrace. If so, I would rely on the debugger (during development) and letting the process coredump in production (or mini-dump on windows). Together with proper symbol-management, you should have no trouble figuring the causing instruction post-mortem.
For Windows, CaptureStackBackTrace()
is also an option, which requires less preparation code on the user's end than StackWalk64()
does. (Also, for a similar scenario I had, CaptureStackBackTrace()
ended up working better (more reliably) than StackWalk64()
.)
May i point you to my article. Its only a few lines of code.
Although i currently have problems with the x64 implementation of this.
You should be using the unwind library.
unw_cursor_t cursor; unw_context_t uc;
unw_word_t ip, sp;
unw_getcontext(&uc);
unw_init_local(&cursor, &uc);
unsigned long a[100];
int ctr = 0;
while (unw_step(&cursor) > 0) {
unw_get_reg(&cursor, UNW_REG_IP, &ip);
unw_get_reg(&cursor, UNW_REG_SP, &sp);
if (ctr >= 10) break;
a[ctr++] = ip;
}
Your approach also would work fine unless you make a call from a shared library.
You can use the addr2line
command on Linux to get the source function / line number of the corresponding PC.
"I know there's no standard C function to do this. I was wondering what are the techniques to to this on Windows and *nix? "
No standard function ... "aye, there's the rub".
Dumping the stack has nothing to do with programming language - at least not high level languages, but certainly assembler - and everything to do with being processor specific.
I am going to guess that you are thinking of "Windows and *nix" on a standard "IBM compatible" PC, but I seem to recall that even windows runs on powerPC (motorola processor) and Linux runs on just about anything.
In short, "there are more processors in heaven and earth, Horatio..." and every single one needs its own stack dump routine.
Doubly so for registers, which are also useful to dump.