Am I correct in assuming that if you have an object that is contained inside a Java Set<> (or as a key in a Map<> for that matter), any fields that are used to determine identity or relation (via hashCode()
, equals()
, compareTo()
etc.) cannot be changed without causing unspecified behavior for operations on the collection? (edit: as alluded to in this other question)
(In other words, these fields should either be immutable, or you should require the object to be removed from the collection, then changed, then reinserted.)
The reason I ask is that I was reading the Hibernate Annotations reference guide and it has an example where there is a HashSet<Toy>
but the Toy
class has fields name
and serial
that are mutable and are also used in the hashCode()
calculation... a red flag went off in my head and I just wanted to make sure I understood the implications of it.