Possible Duplicate:
The case against checked exceptions
EDIT: It appears I didn't phrase my question correctly, and I can understand the frustration.
I'm looking for some information that explains where I should use checked exceptions and where I should not use it. Most of the information on this subject is one sided - love/hate relationship. I think people make the assumption that one is bad over the other, or that developers always do a bad job about it.
EDIT 2: Ok, I did some Google searching (I wish I had done that before posting here), and found some balanced answers. I'm including them so it may help anyone looking for an answer, not another debate (like the duplicate post mentioned above)
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp05254.html
It appears Rod has a balanced discussion on this topic in his book, J2EE design without EJB:
http://www.theserverside.com/tt/articles/article.tss?l=RodJohnsonInterview
It also appears that if you use validation on domain object, it would not be a bad idea to use checked exceptions. Anyway, if you read the materials above, you could be convinced about not using checked exceptions or minimize the chances of using it.
Rich, has provided an excellent link. Thanks, Rich!
http://onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2003/11/19/exceptions.html
Some more:
http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/dev2arch/2006/11/effective-exceptions2.html