What is the difference between doing use My::Module
and require My::Module
?
views:
423answers:
4From perldoc -q
"difference between require and use":
use Module
is likerequire Module
, except thatuse
4.1: loads the module at compile time, not run-time.
4.2: imports symbols and semantics from that package to the current one.
The use
function:
use ModuleName;
is equivalent to the following code using the require
function:
BEGIN {
require ModuleName;
ModuleName->import;
}
The BEGIN
block causes this code to run as soon as the parser sees it. The require
loads the module or die
s trying. And then the import
function of the module is called. The import
function may do all sorts of things, but it is common for it to load functions into the namespace that use
d it (often with the Exporter
module).
Perl comes with great documentation. Everyone would benefit from reading the entire documentation at least once every few months.
C:\>
perldoc -f require
Otherwise
require
demands that a library file be included if it hasn't already been included. The file is included via the do-FILE mechanism, which is essentially just a variety of eval with the caveat that lexical variables in the invoking script will be invisible to the included code. Has semantics similar to the following subroutine:
... etc. Similarly,
C:\>
perldoc -f use
Imports some semantics into the current package from the named module, generally by aliasing certain subroutine or variable names into your package. It is exactly equivalent to
BEGIN { require Module; Module->import( LIST ); }
except that Module must be a bareword.
... etc
There is also the perlfaq entry although I think it is less informative than the above.