tags:

views:

6641

answers:

7

What's a simple and canonical way to read an entire file into memory in Scala? (Ideally, with control over character encoding.)

The best I can come up with is:

scala.io.Source.fromPath("file.txt").getLines.reduceLeft(_+_)

or am I supposed to use one of Java's god-awful idioms, the best of which (without using an external library) seems to be:

import java.util.Scanner
import java.io.File
new Scanner(new File("file.txt")).useDelimiter("\\Z").next()

From reading mailing list discussions, it's not clear to me that scala.io.Source is even supposed to be the canonical I/O library. I don't understand what its intended purpose is, exactly.

... I'd like something dead-simple and easy to remember. For example, in these languages it's very hard to forget the idiom ...

Ruby    open("file.txt").read
Ruby    File.read("file.txt")
Python  open("file.txt").read()
+32  A: 
val lines = scala.io.Source.fromFile("file.txt").mkString

By the way, "scala." isn't really necessary, as it's always in scope anyway, and you can, of course, import io's contents, fully or partially, and avoid having to prepend "io." too.

Daniel
Ah, definitely better then reduceLeft(_+_).
Brendan OConnor
I'm too late to the party, but I'd hate for people not to know they can do "io.File("/etc/passwd").slurp" in trunk.
extempore
I'd hate for Scala 2.8 to have a method called "`slurp`", but it seems I'm stuck with it anyway.
Daniel
I would have been negotiable on the name, but due to your "utter disgust" I will do my best to keep it the way it is. Thank you for your characteristic thanklessness.
extempore
@extempore If you truly think I'm thankless, I'm truly sorry. I deeply appreciate your support of the Scala language and each and every time you have personally looked into an issue I brought up, suggested a solution to a problem I had, or explained something to me. I'll take the opportunity, then, to thank you for turning scala.io into something decent and worthy. I'll be more vocal in my thanks from now on, but I still hate the name, sorry.
Daniel
I don't want more vocal thanks, I would just like for you and everyone else to suppress that overwhelming disgust and simply make suggestions instead. Also to keep in mind I'm the only one working on most of the standard library and much of the compiler as well, and there are only so many hours.
extempore
"slurp" has been the name for reading an entire file at once in Perl for many years. Perl has a more visceral and informal naming tradition than the C family of languages, which some may find distasteful, but in this case I think it fits: it's an ugly word for an ugly practice. When you slurp(), you know you're doing something naughty because you just had to type that.
Marcus Downing
"make suggestions instead" - Source should detect the file's encoding (within reason) and read it correctly. Unicode's BOMs are standard, and there are other metrics that are good enough to guess an encoding given the first hundred bytes of a file. I shouldn't have to invent something clever to detect a file that happens to be UCS-2. Yes, this has happened to me.
Marcus Downing
I'm pretty sure I have seen such code, but I definitely can't find it right now on trunk.
Daniel
(I wasn't actually using Scala at the time...)
Marcus Downing
File.read() would be a nicer name, and consistent with Ruby and Python besides.
Brendan OConnor
@extempore: you can't stop people from being disgusted. It's just the way it is. It shouldn't bother you that some people don't like every choice you've made. That's just life, you can't please everybody :)
Alex Baranosky
Scala 2.8 doesn't have a `fromPath` method. `fromFile` is still being used, and still accepts the file name in a string.
Hosam Aly
@Hosam Yeah, they reverted that at the very end. Fixed.
Daniel
+11  A: 
// for file with utf-8 encoding
val lines = scala.io.Source.fromFile("file.txt", "utf-8").getLines.mkString
Walter Chang
A: 

The obvious question being "why do you want to read in the entire file?" This is obviously not a scalable solution if your files get very large. The scala.io.Source gives you back an Iterator[String] from the getLines method, which is very useful and concise.

It's not much of a job to come up with an implicit conversion using the underlying java IO utilities to convert a File, a Reader or an InputStream to a String. I think that the lack of scalability means that they are correct not to add this to the standard API.

oxbow_lakes
Seriously? How many files do you really read on a regular basis that have real problems fitting in memory? The vast majority of files in the vast majority of programs I have ever dealt with are easily small enough to fit into memory. Frankly, big data files are the exception, and you should realize that and program accordingly if you are going to be reading/writing them.
Christopher
oxbow_lakes, I disagree. There are many situations involving small files whose size will not grow in the future.
Brendan OConnor
I agree that they are the exception - but I think that is why a read-entire-file-into-memory is not in either the JDK or the Scala SDK. It's a 3 line utility method for you to write yourself: get over it
oxbow_lakes
+5  A: 

Just to expand on Daniel's solution, you can shorten things up tremendously by inserting the following import into any file which requires file manipulation:

import scala.io.Source._

With this, you can now do:

val lines = fromFile("file.txt").getLines

I would be wary of reading an entire file into a single String. It's a very bad habit, one which will bite you sooner and harder than you think. The getLines method returns a value of type Iterator[String]. It's effectively a lazy cursor into the file, allowing you to examine just the data you need without risking memory glut.

Oh, and to answer your implied question about Source: yes, it is the canonical I/O library. Most code ends up using java.io due to its lower-level interface and better compatibility with existing frameworks, but any code which has a choice should be using Source, particularly for simple file manipulation.

Daniel Spiewak
OK. There's a story for my negative impression of Source: I once was in a different situation than now, where I had a very large file that wouldn't fit into memory. Using Source caused the program to crash; it turned out it was trying to read the whole thing at once.
Brendan OConnor
Source is not supposed to read the whole file into memory. If you use toList after getLines, or some other method which will produce a collection, then you get everything into memory. Now, Source is a *hack*, intended to get the job done, not a carefully thought-out library. It will be improved in Scala 2.8, but there's definitely opportunity for the Scala community to become active in defining a good I/O API.
Daniel
+1  A: 

I've been told that Source.fromFile is problematic. Personally, I have had problems opening large files with Source.fromFile and have had to resort to Java InputStreams.

Another interesting solution is using scalax. Here's an example of some well commented code that opens a log file using ManagedResource to open a file with scalax helpers: http://pastie.org/pastes/420714

Ikai Lan
+1 for mentioning scalax
Daniel
+5  A: 

Use trunk:

scala> io.File("/etc/passwd").slurp
res0: String = 
##
# User Database
# 
... etc
extempore
"`slurp`"? Have we truly ditched obvious, intuitive name? The problem with `slurp` is that it might make sense after-the-fact, to someone with English as a first language, at least, but you would never think of it to begin with!
Daniel
Just stumbled on this question/answer. `File` is no longer in 2.8.0, isn't it?
huynhjl
You can still sneak it in from scala.tools.nsc.io.File, though I assume that location may change in the future, so use at your own risk. ;-) Oh, and let me chime in to say how much I hate "slurp" as the name as well.
Steve
A: 

as a few people mentioned scala.io.Source is best to be avoided due to connection leaks.

Probably scalax and pure java libs like commons-io are the best options until the new incubator project (ie scala-io) gets merged.

poko