tags:

views:

440

answers:

2

Hi, if I am trying to run a shell-command in an emacs lisp function in which I call rsync (or scp) multiple times, which shell-command variant should I use? I am currently using shell-command, which locks up emacs until the process is done, and the output that should be visible with the --verbose to rysnc is not printed; I can use shell-command with an '&' at the end of the command string to make it asynchronous, which does print the progress - but while it doesn't 'lock up' emacs entirely, the minibuffer repeatedly asks if I want to kill the process which is crippling in the meantime; and start-process-shell-command, which appears to halt the function only after the first file/directory is transferred; neglecting the rest when there are multiple rsync calls made through my function. None of these seem ideal... any hints? Thank you much!

+2  A: 

One solution might be to run the command in an actual shell buffer. Then you get to choose which one of those to run:

M-x shell
M-x eshell
M-x term

If you like that idea, you can code it up like this:

(defun my-rsynch-routine ()
  "run some rsynch processes"
  (with-temp-buffer
    (shell (current-buffer))
    (process-send-string nil "rsynch ...")
    (process-send-string nil "rsynch ...")
    (process-send-string nil "rsynch ...")))

Read more on 'process-send-string for its usage. You might also want to have some error checking on the output from the processes.

Trey Jackson
Hello Trey, thank you always. This time I had to choose with Jonathan's solution but as it was direct and well-suited for this purpose (and process-send-string seemed to work only in a buffer created and explicitly referenced (with get-buffer-create) rather than in temp-buffer...) but I am reading up on the filtering functions... there is much to grok and I am sure I will find uses at the end of it. Thank you again.
Stephen
+4  A: 

I have had the most success using start-process myself.

(start-process "process-name" 
               (get-buffer-create "*rsync-buffer*") 
               "/path/to/rsync"
               arg1
               ...
               argn)

This will send all the output to a single buffer.

Jonathan Arkell
This is very straightforward - thank you.
Stephen