tags:

views:

1290

answers:

12

As I was typing my curriculum vitae, I was wondering if it was good idea to include my GPA. I'm currently in software engineering and have a 4.0 GPA, but don't like mentioning it too much as I fear people might see this as bragging...

But at the same time, I feel like it is something that could help me land a job (or an interview, at least). What should I do?

+1  A: 

Yes, put it on. You've either attended a cruddy university, or you've demonstrated your consistent effort toward your education by maintaining that.

Novelocrat
+7  A: 

Typically you mention your GPA if you have a 3.0 or better and you believe your university experience is relevant to the position you are applying for.

Mayo
+19  A: 

If you have a good GPA and you're fresh out of college, put it there. After you've had a job or two, take it off (and move the Edu part after the job history).

Matt Rogish
Moving education after job history may not always be a good idea. For example, if applying to Oak Ridge National Laboratories then education is important, as frequently they have a degree minimum, and you want to show that quickly.
James Black
+3  A: 

As an interviewer, I don't care about your GPA as it has nothing to do with the job I'm hiring you for.

If I were interviewing you for a position my company has right now (which we do), I would want to know THREE, and only three things:

  1. Can you do the work at the level of quality (and speed) we need it done?
  2. Are you motivated to improve your skillset on your own?
  3. Will your personality be a good fit with the rest of the team?

GPA answers none of those questions--neither does the name of school you attended.

(updated: wrong number of things) :P

BryanH
But isn't the point of a resume to *land* an interview? I probably won't mention my GPA *during* an interview, but wouldn't you consider it representative of the student capacities?
Gab Royer
GPA and the school you attended means a lot for a fresh graduate. If you're actually looking at less experienced candidates, then you'd be a fool not to at least consider that information.Your answer boils down to "I only care if you're the right candidate". Really? Gee, what a surprise. Factors such as GPA and institution for a recent graduate can be indicators to those things.
phoebus
Drink from the firehose of dead trees? Ugh. What about this: guy goes to website, clicks on "apply for job" then gets a page with a relatively simple programming task. Instructions: code in any language, pack up all necessary files to (compile/run) and submit to [email protected] -- those who actually submit something that could reasonably work get a call. Those who can't be bothered go off and submit their dead trees to craigslist, monster, and all the other (ahem) sites where resumes go to die.
BryanH
Sorry - missed this one: "Factors such as GPA and institution for a recent graduate ..." Er, GPA and institution (or lack thereof) do not answer my three questions. Have you ever had one of those ESL grad students teaching undergrad calc? The guy (or gal) couldn't teach his way out of a paper bag, but his 4.0 from MIT means... er, um... (sigh)
BryanH
His 4.0 from MIT likely means he's quite a bit brighter than you, regardless of your disdain for resumes. What you don't seem to understand is that the purpose of a resume is to give an overview of your history and qualifications, and a GPA from a fine institution fits right into that. No one is suggesting that you should hire someone based solely on their resume or the GPA contained therein. The fact is that no resume could answer any of your "questions" by itself, so I guess you just want to pull random people off the street.
phoebus
Oh dear. Appeal to Ridicule *and* Appeal to Authority? Sorry, but my experience of successfully hiring people holds up quite well on its own merits. However, please continue to put your GPA on your resume. If you apply at my company, I could care less, as I will be asking you to demonstrate your ability to do the job. If you can't do that, then there won't be any question about whether you are right for job.
BryanH
I think you are misunderstanding both the question and phoebus... Nobody is talking about landing a *job* with a resume, as a matter of fact resume aren't exactly to land a job, their made to get an *interview* where you can then show your aptitude for the job. If you don't consider resume, then great! But reality is, resume are still important in today's world and I was wondering if it was a good idea to put my GPA on it.
Gab Royer
It boils down to this: "what piece of information can I put on a piece of paper that will cause it to be noticed in a stack of many (possibly hundreds) of others?" The accepted answer: "If you have a good GPA and you're fresh out of college, put it there." My answer: "You're doing it wrong." If you (and everyone else here) thinks I'm full of sawdust, that's fine. Good luck.
BryanH
+12  A: 

As a former recruiter, I want to see it. If it's missing, I generally assume it's < 3.0. I'd also include any university honors that came with the 4.0.

Once you've been working for a while, say 5 years, it's not really as important. However, I'd probably still stick with listing the 4.0 for longer if you've only had one or two positions during that time.

Resumes are designed to advertise you, so they should be listing positive things about you, and education is important.

Norman
+2  A: 

If you have less than two other relevant jobs and/or five years of work experience, I'd probably put the GPA down. If you're a more seasoned candidate, just the institution and degree will suffice.

However, never feel bad about advertising yourself on a resume. That's what it's for. The reason I'd tend not to include the GPA info once I was more experienced is more stylistic than anything else.

phoebus
Thanks for the advice!
Gab Royer
+4  A: 

If you are new out of school, put it in.

If it is relevant, put it in.

Employers are generally more interested in experience than GPA.

Now, here's one interesting side note. I'm aware of at least two instances where the person with a lower GPA was hired and not the 4.0 applicant, all things being equal.

The reason for it was that there's a perception that a 4.0 person is a perfectionist, when someone with a high, but not dead-on GPA knows how to succeed and is used to failure. Many jobs are not about getting it right the first time, but in knowing how to bounce back from failure with new ideas.

Walt Stoneburner
+2  A: 

With a 4.0 (really, anything better than a 3.0) it is worth mentioning. A simple "4.0 GPA, summa cum laude with University and Departmental Honors" or what have you, doesn't take up much space and shows that you cared about the quality of your coursework.

I have been in industry for 15 years, and I still put down the fact that I graduated with a 4.0 on my resume next to each of my degrees. I don't think anyone will judge you negatively for being proud of an accomplishment like that.

Edward Kmett
A: 

As someone who's interviewed college graduates, it is very informative to me to know your GPA. I always ask how you did in the important classes like Data Structures.

After you've had a job, it's no longer relevant, because I'm more interested in your job and project experience.

Loadmaster
A: 

jesus man, stop bragging

johnnyMCtwoPOINToh
Haha! !
Gab Royer
A: 

if you are a fresher then put it. Otherwise if you have more than 4 years of experience and changed 2 organisations then it is not neccessary to put it in the resume. If at all you want to put it, place it after your job experience and your reponsibilities.

PJ
A: 

I would put it there, even if it's just to show that you are proud of your archievements and confident enougth to talk about it. People who are too shy to talk about their accomplishments are, generally speaking, a bit of a problem in a team. E.g. they might find a great solution for a hard problem, but tell nobody about it because of their shyness, thus doing effictively nothing to solve the problem.

ammoQ