views:

306

answers:

3

I'm dealing with code that does various IO operations with files, and I want to make it able to deal with international filenames. I'm working on a Mac with Java 1.5, and if a filename contains Unicode characters that require surrogates, the JVM can't seem to locate the file. For example, my test file is:

"草鷗外.gif" which gets broken into the Java characters \u8349\uD85B\uDFF6\u9DD7\u5916.gif

If I create a file from this filename, I can't open it because I get a FileNotFound exception. Even using this on the folder containing the file will fail:

File[] files = folder.listFiles(); 
for (File file : files) {
    if (!file.exists()) {
        System.out.println("Failed to find File"); //Fails on the surrogate filename
    }
}

Most of the code I am actually dealing with are of the form:

FileInputStream instream = new FileInputStream(new File("草鷗外.gif"));
// operations follow

Is there some way I can address this problem, either escaping the filenames or opening files differently?

+2  A: 

If your environment's default locale does not include those characters you cannot open the file.

See:

http://bugs.sun.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=4733494

Edit: Alright.. What you need is to change the system locale. Whatever OS you are using.

JCasso
Is it not possible to do this without changing the system locale? The program I am building will need to run on any locale, and I should be able to input these characters and deal with these files even in a US/English locale.
Bear
+4  A: 

I suspect one of Java or Mac is using CESU-8 instead of proper UTF-8. Java uses “modified UTF-8” (which is a slight variation of CESU-8) for a variety of internal purposes, but I wasn't aware it could use it as a filesystem/defaultCharset. Unfortunately I have neither Mac nor Java here to test with.

“Modified” is a modified way of saying “badly bugged”. Instead of outputting a four-byte UTF-8 sequence for supplementary (non-BMP) characters like 𦿶:

\xF0\xA6\xBF\xB6

it outputs a UTF-8-encoded sequence for each of the surrogates:

\xED\xA1\x9B\xED\xBF\xB6

This isn't a valid UTF-8 sequence, but a lot of decoders will allow it anyway. Problem is if you round-trip that through a real UTF-8 encoder you've got a different string, the four-byte one above. Try to access the file with that name and boom! fail.

So first let's just check how filenames are actually stored under your current filesystem, using a platform that uses bytes for filenames such as Python 2.x:

$ python
Python 2.x.something (blah blah)
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import os
>>> os.listdir('.')

On my filesystem (Linux, ext4, UTF-8), the filename “草𦿶鷗外.gif” comes out as:

['\xe8\x8d\x89\xf0\xa6\xbf\xb6\xe9\xb7\x97\xe5\xa4\x96.gif']

which is what you want. If that's what you get, it's probably Java doing it wrong. If you get the longer six-byte-character version:

['\xe8\x8d\x89\xed\xa1\x9b\xed\xbf\xb6\xe9\xb7\x97\xe5\xa4\x96.gif']

it's probably OS X doing it wrong... does it always store filenames like this? (Or did the files come from somewhere else originally?) What if you rename the file to the ‘proper’ version?:

os.rename('\xe8\x8d\x89\xed\xa1\x9b\xed\xbf\xb6\xe9\xb7\x97\xe5\xa4\x96.gif', '\xe8\x8d\x89\xf0\xa6\xbf\xb6\xe9\xb7\x97\xe5\xa4\x96.gif')
bobince
Not really a bug as it's part of the spec (even if it is often confusing.)
finnw
The result of the python commands was the proper filename you listed first, so it must be Java not playing nice.
Bear
Oh, that's unfortunate. Even if you detected the broken-CESU-8 situation, I can't think of any way to work around it and get a byte-oriented filename interface. :-( You might have to explicitly disallow the surrogates until such time as Sun fix it. How poor.
bobince
+1  A: 

This turned out to be a problem with the Mac JVM (tested on 1.5 and 1.6). Filenames containing supplementary characters / surrogate pairs cannot be accessed with the Java File class. I ended up writing a JNI library with Carbon calls for the Mac version of the project (ick). I suspect the CESU-8 issue bobince mentioned, as the JNI call to get UTF-8 characters returned a CESU-8 string. Doesn't look like it's something you can really get around.

Bear