A: 

You just need a more generalized formula for calculating xloc and yloc.

xloc = (j * (newwidth+1)) / (x+1);
yloc = (i * (newheight+1)) / (y+1);

This assumes your variables have enough range for the multiplication results.

Mark Ransom
+1  A: 

MATLAB has already done it for you. Use imresize:

output = imresize(input,size(input)*2,'nearest');

or if you want to scale both x & y equally,

output = imresize(input,2,'nearest');
Jacob
I am already aware the build-in function, but I need to achieve this by my own code.thanks
Hellnar
Sorry, didn't know! Good to see you found your answer.
Jacob
+4  A: 

A while back I went through the code of the IMRESIZE function in the MATLAB Image Processing Toolbox to create a simplified version for just nearest neighbor interpolation of images. Here's how it would be applied to your problem:

% Initializations:

scale = [2 2];              % The resolution scale factors: [rows columns]
oldSize = size(inputImage);                   % Get the size of your image
newSize = max(floor(scale.*oldSize(1:2)),1);  % Compute the new image size

% Compute an upsampled set of indices:

rowIndex = min(round(((1:newSize(1))-0.5)./scale(1)+0.5),oldSize(1));
colIndex = min(round(((1:newSize(2))-0.5)./scale(2)+0.5),oldSize(2));

% Index old image to get new image:

outputImage = inputImage(rowIndex,colIndex,:);

Another option would be to use the built-in INTERP2 function, although you mentioned not wanting to use built-in functions in one of your comments.

EDIT: EXPLANATION

In case anyone is interested, I thought I'd explain how the solution above works...

newSize = max(floor(scale.*oldSize(1:2)),1);

First, to get the new row and column sizes the old row and column sizes are multiplied by the scale factor. This result is rounded down to the nearest integer with FLOOR. If the scale factor is less than 1 you could end up with a weird case of one of the size values being 0, which is why the call to MAX is there to replace anything less than 1 with 1.

rowIndex = min(round(((1:newSize(1))-0.5)./scale(1)+0.5),oldSize(1));
colIndex = min(round(((1:newSize(2))-0.5)./scale(2)+0.5),oldSize(2));

Next, a new set of indices is computed for both the rows and columns. First, a set of indices for the upsampled image is computed: 1:newSize(...). Each image pixel is considered as having a given width, such that pixel 1 spans from 0 to 1, pixel 2 spans from 1 to 2, etc.. The "coordinate" of the pixel is thus treated as the center, which is why 0.5 is subtracted from the indices. These coordinates are then divided by the scale factor to give a set of pixel-center coordinates for the original image, which then have 0.5 added to them and are rounded off to get a set of integer indices for the original image. The call to MIN ensures that none of these indices are larger than the original image size oldSize(...).

outputImage = inputImage(rowIndex,colIndex,:);

Finally, the new upsampled image is created by simply indexing into the original image.

gnovice
works great, thanks!
Hellnar
@Hellnar: Glad to help! I also just updated the code so it should work for non-integer scale factors as well as for grayscale or RGB images.
gnovice
+3  A: 
Amro