Whenever I'm writing up a new blog post or creating new web pages, I try to include as much machine-readable information as possible. Rel tags are one common approach to semantic markup, but in terms of actual microformats, they're not as common.
We're currently working on an enhancement at The Office where we'll be providing contact information for lists of business representatives in hCard format, which you'll likely find is one of the most common formats beside hCalendar for events.
The thing about microformats is that you generally don't see them unless you're actively looking. They are, after all, there primarily for machine use - not human. The other thing is that unless you're consciously going out of your way to structure data in a microformat spec to meet a specific business need, you will likely not see a need to provide that information. You may not even be aware that it exists.
In terms of tracking which has the greater uptake or whether your particular implementation is getting traction, there aren't any official or formal measures in place. For global trends, Google Trends shows that RDFa is gaining a lot more ground on the simpler Microformat specification. This is likely because awareness and adoption of Semantic Web techniques is increasing. From a local "just my site, thanks" point of view, you could use your stats package (GA, Piwik, Clicky, etc) to track clicks on your microformat action links (e.g. "save to Outlook") as campaigns or use a JavaScript library to perform some behind-the-scenes action when the user interacts with your data.