views:

416

answers:

4

In Ruby, a standard convention is to use a question mark at the end of a method name to indicate the method returns a boolean result:

[].empty?   #=> true

Another standard convention is to end a method name with an exclamation point if the method is destructive (that is, it modifies the original data):

mylist.sort! # sort mylist in-place

Recently I have seen these same conventions used in Scheme. Which makes me wonder, what other languages use/support this convention? Are there any other special characters that are commonly used for naming by these or other languages?

+1  A: 

If you count Javascript as a language, many frameworks seem to make use of the '$' character to mean "Selector"; For example, one might use $("id-of-some-item") in Prototype.js or $("#id-of-some-item") in jQuery to select a tag that was written <div id="id-of-some-item">. The use of these selection functions is actually quite complicated and powerful (if you're interested, check out their supporting documentation at prototypejs.org and jquery.com), but they boil down to doing something I consider semantically similar to what you've indicated.

Again, this is assuming you count Javascript as a language.

Dereleased
*If*? That's a bit harsh, isn't it?
paxdiablo
Oh, let me pull out the tape ... it's even Turing Complete. (Geek test.) Yes, it is a computer programming language, perhaps not liked by some, but Lemon Meringue Pie doesn't suddenly stop becoming pie because I detest how it tastes.
pst
I would not count on this ($ == Selector): http://stackoverflow.com/questions/205853/why-would-a-javascript-variable-start-with-a-dollar-sign
Juri Glass
Juri, I was only commenting on the apparent convention created by popular frameworks, there is no more a rule in JavaScript for these characters than in Ruby for ? and !, or in Haskell for ' -- it's just conventionPaxdiablo, I am simply trying to appease the crowd who gets all curmudgeon-y if you imply that a weak/dynamically-typed interpreted-language counts as programming. Of course it does, and getting it right in a major application can be every bit as difficult as accomplishing other goals with other tools; it's all about picking the right one for the job.
Dereleased
+1  A: 

Prepending "@" to a method name (or any identifier) in C# allows you to name that method with a normally-reserved keyword.

void null() {}
// Invalid token 'null' in class, struct, or interface member declaration

void @null()
// compiles

Don't do this; it's mainly for machine-generated code, like datasets. MSDN page on the topic.

Michael Petrotta
Is there any way to quote an arbitrary identifier in C#?
pst
+1  A: 

I'm not a big fan of special characters in function names, but then I'll also beat to death, with a stick of wet celery to tease out the pain, anyone I find putting spaces into file names :-)

The ? variant can just as easily be done with something like isEmpty() and the ! variant with sortInPlace().

English is a very adaptive language, even without the punctuation.

In either case, my languages of choice (C and Java) use punctuation for all sorts of other things. Having them in identifiers as well would make the lexical analysis a nightmare.

paxdiablo
"Having them in identifiers as well would make the lexical analysis a nightmare." This statement is simply not true. While I will not defend Ruby's syntax (which is not context free and has many odd quirks: e.g. <code>a??b:c</code>), the use of non [a-z_][a-z0-9_] is not necessarily more complicated to run through a lexer. Consider Scheme as a very "simple" counter-example (and Perl as, perhaps a prime example, although it does NOT allow "special" characters in identifiers). The use of such symbols, however, is wide open to opinion.
pst
+2  A: 
pst
Help help! How can I turn the bottom part of this post into a "community wiki"?
pst
Anyone can edit your post, so it is a community wiki. What are you trying to do? I can incorporate these and everyone else's comments into the original top-level question so there is a single list for everyone.
Justin Ethier
Preferably just to have the list at the bottom edited. I wasn't sure that it could be edited by others. This stackoverflow thing is still a bit new to me.
pst