I don't know any Ruby and am reading some documentationon it now. A doubt I have just after reading about using code blocks and the "yield" keyword is whether it is possible to pass more than one code block to a function, and use both at will from within the called function.
+1
A:
Syntactically, using the yield
statement only supports one code block that's passed to the function.
Of course, you can pass a function multiple other functions or "code block objects" (Proc
objects), and use them, but not by simply using yield
.
abyx
2009-11-25 14:08:22
+10
A:
You can pass only one block at once but blocks are actually Proc
instances and you can pass as many instances you wish as parameters.
def mymethod(proc1, proc2, &block)
proc1.call
yield if block_given?
proc2.call
end
mymethod(Proc.new {}, Proc.new {}) do
# ...
end
However, it rarely makes sense.
Simone Carletti
2009-11-25 14:11:29
Blocks aren't exactly procs. They have common usecases and syntaxes, but they have enough implementation differences to cause confusing behavior. It's a bit pedantic, but the scoping difference has bit me before.
fengb
2009-11-25 14:25:49
@fengb I just made a test. http://gist.github.com/242746 Do you have some more documentation about the difference between Proc and block? Ruby is telling me a block is a Proc.
Simone Carletti
2009-11-25 14:31:51
fengb
2009-11-25 15:00:11
Thanks. This is a long article, I'm going to crunch it in small pieces. :)
Simone Carletti
2009-11-25 15:56:14
A:
You can use the call
method rather than yield to handle two separate blocks passed in.
Here's how:
def mood(state, happy, sad )
if (state== :happy)
happy.call
else
sad.call
end
end
mood(:happy, Proc.new {puts 'yay!'} , Proc.new {puts 'boo!'})
mood(:sad, Proc.new {puts 'yay!'} , Proc.new {puts 'boo!'})
You can pass args with for example:
happy.call('very much')
arguments work just like you'd expect in blocks:
Proc.new {|amount| puts "yay #{amount} !"}
cartoonfox
2009-11-25 14:18:27