tags:

views:

385

answers:

3

can use anything in any order? does placing of <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;charset=UTF-8"> is important before <title>

this is most used, is it best way?

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
        "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"&gt;

<html lang="en">

<head>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
    <title>Title Goes Here</title>
    <link rel="stylesheet" href="http://sstatic.net/so/all.css?v=5912"&gt;
    <link rel="shortcut icon" href="http://sstatic.net/so/favicon.ico"&gt;
     <script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3.2/jquery.min.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
<script type="text/javascript">
    $(function() {

        $("#wmd-input").focus();
        $("#title").focus();
        $("#revisions-list").change(function() { window.location = '/posts/1987065/edit/' + $(this).val(); });

    });        
</script>


</head>

<body>
<p>This is my web page</p>

    <script type="text/javascript" src="http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/mootools.js"&gt;&lt;/script&gt;
</body>

</html>

this site http://stackoverflow.com doesn't have any encoding and <meta>

I use a CMS which has SEO component which adds every <meta> for SEO after all js and css. files. can placing of any elements in any order which are allowed in <head> affect document compatibility and encoding?

+9  A: 

In HTML, the DOCTYPE must come first, followed by a single <html> element, which must contain a <head> element containing a <title> element, followed by a <body> element. See the description of the global structure of an HTML document in HTML 4.01 and the HTML5 draft; the actual requirements are mostly the same other than the DOCTYPE, but they are described differently.

The actual tags (<html>, </html>, <head>, etc) are optional; the elements will be created automatically if the tags don't exist. <title> is the only required tag in HTML. The shortest valid HTML 4.01 document (at least, that I could generate) is (needs a <p> because there needs to be something in the <body> to be valid):

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd"&gt;&lt;title&gt;&lt;/title&gt;&lt;p&gt;

And the shortest valid HTML5 document:

<!DOCTYPE html><title></title>

Note that in XHTML, all tags must be specified explicitly; no elements will be inserted implicitly.

Browsers perform content type sniffing in some circumstances to determine the type of a resource that hasn't been specified using a Content-Type HTTP header, and also character encoding sniffing if the Content-Type header hasn't been supplied or doesn't include a charset (you should generally try to include these headers, and make sure that they are correct, but there are some circumstances in which you cannot, such as local files not transferred over HTTP). They only sniff a limited number of bytes at the beginning of the document for these purposes, though, so anything that is intended to affect the content sniffing or character encoding sniffing should be near the beginning of the document.

For this reason, HTML5 specifies that any meta tag which is used to specify the character set (either <meta http-equiv="Content-type" content="text/html; charset=..."> or simply <meta charset=...>) must be within the first 512 bytes of the file in order to take effect. So, if you are going to include character encoding information within your document, you should put the tag early in the file, possibly even before the <title> element. But recall that this tag is unnecessary if you properly specify a Content-type header.

In CSS, later style declarations take precedence over earlier ones, all else being equal. So, you should generally put the most generic style sheets that may be overridden earlier, and the more specific style sheets later.

For performance reasons, it can be a good idea to put scripts at the bottom of the page, right before the </body>, because loading scripts blocks the rendering of the page.

Obviously, <script> tags should be ordered so that scripts that depend on each order have the dependencies loaded first.

On the whole, other than the constraints I have already specified, the ordering of tags within <head> shouldn't matter too much, other than for readability. I tend to like to see the <title> towards the top, and put the other <meta> tags in some sort of logical order.

Most of the time, the order you should put things into the body of an HTML document should be the order they should be displayed in, or the order they should be accessed. You can use CSS to rearrange things, but screen readers will generally read things in source order, search indexes will extract things in source order, and so on.

Brian Campbell
+1 Well done. Great answer.
Pekka
That TITLE is mandatory was news to me and seems a little strange. But checking the official spec you're absolutely correct of course. Live and learn!
Carl Smotricz
What surprised me is that it's the only mandatory tag... I've actually argued that it should be made optional as well in HTML5 (as it's not really necessary for things like gadgets that will always be in an `iframe` and never have a visible title), but they decided not to change that this time around.
Brian Campbell
I like this kind of answers +1.
BalusC
@Brian - thanks brian for this nice explanation. SO never disappointed me. this site has masterminds. and one more thing U understands question very well then u give answer very well. great work.
metal-gear-solid
@Brian - i expect you to answer my this question http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1962697/what-are-pros-and-cons-to-use-vendor-specific-extesions-which-are-not-included
metal-gear-solid
@Jitendra Ha ha! I have answered a bunch of your recent questions, haven't I? I'm a bit drunk from a new year's party. But I can try... I just won't guarantee that my answer will be as good as the last couple, though.
Brian Campbell
Actually, you can take advantage of SHORTTAG, shrinking that `<title></title><p>` to `<title//<p>` for the shortest valid HTML 4.01 document ;)
kangax
@kangax Technically valid, but SHORTTAG doesn't actually work in any browsers that I know of, so I consider that more of a bug in the spec than an actual feature. But yes, if you're just considering what is a valid HTML 4.01 document, you can indeed use a SHORTTAG abbreviation.
Brian Campbell
+2  A: 

You want your content-type first as this denotes the character encoding, otherwise if it comes later on, some browsers attempt to guess the encoding. (I can't remember the specifics, but I think IE will guess if it doesn't find an encoding in the first 75 characters of the document?)

Most webservers send the encoding in the HTTP headers, but if a user saves your page, the headers aren't saved with it.

I'd put CSS references second so the browser downloads them as soon as possible.

JavaScript I wouldn't put in the head, it should go at the bottom of your pages as downloading them blocks rendering of pages.

Ryan Doherty
A: 

IIRC, some browsers will re-load the document upon encountering a content-type element. So that element should probably come first within the head element of the document.

Loadmaster