Hello all.
I am having to import data from a database where the character encoding being used is ISO-8859-1 and the new site that we are using is using UTF-8. The site that the data is being pulled from is old, hence the reason that it is in ISO still I presume.
I have tried the following solutions with no results:
iconv
Nevertheless, after it published a proposed rule in March 2008 that would have banned such items altogether, the Postal Service received numerous comments opposing its planned action for four main reasons: (1) the original language was vague and overly broad, so the Postal Service has changed the word “munitions†to “explosive devices,†(2) some respondents questioned whether such a problem even existed, though the Postal Service says it has “recorded numerous incidents involving the discovery of mail that exhibited characteristics of possible explosives,†(3) the proposed rule supposedly violated the Second Amendment, and (4) the Postal Service lacks the authority to ban the mailing of such items.
to
Nevertheless, after it published a proposed rule in March 2008 that would have banned such items altogether, the Postal Service received numerous comments opposing its planned action for four main reasons: (1) the original language was vague and overly broad, so the Postal Service has changed the word “munitions†to “explosive devices,†(2) some respondents questioned whether such a problem even existed, though the Postal Service says it has “recorded numerous incidents involving the discovery of mail that exhibited characteristics of possible explosives,†(3) the proposed rule supposedly violated the Second Amendment, and (4) the Postal Service lacks the authority to ban the mailing of such items.
mb_convert_encoding
Same exact result as above.
utf8_encode
Same exact result as above.
utf8_decode
Pulls back an interesting result with all of the ? replacements:
Nevertheless, after it published a proposed rule in March 2008 that would have banned such items altogether, the Postal Service received numerous comments opposing its planned action for four main reasons: (1) the original language was vague and overly broad, so the Postal Service has changed the word ?munitions? to ?explosive devices,? (2) some respondents questioned whether such a problem even existed, though the Postal Service says it has ?recorded numerous incidents involving the discovery of mail that exhibited characteristics of possible explosives,? (3) the proposed rule supposedly violated the Second Amendment, and (4) the Postal Service lacks the authority to ban the mailing of such items.
Not exactly sure what to do here.
Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks!